Suppr超能文献

在根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术后,采用网塞法进行腹股沟疝修补术是安全的。

Inguinal hernia repair with the mesh plug method is safe after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

作者信息

Niitsu Hiroaki, Taomoto Junya, Mita Koji, Yoshimitsu Masanori, Sugiyama Yoichi, Hirabayashi Naoki, Takiyama Wataru

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 2-3 Kasumi 1-chome, Minamiku, Hiroshima, Japan,

出版信息

Surg Today. 2014 May;44(5):897-901. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0784-1. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We evaluated the safety and efficiency of using the mesh plug method (MP) to repair inguinal hernias in patients with a history of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). We also investigated how RRP influences the development of inguinal hernias and impacts their repair.

METHODS

Among 488 adult male patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair during a recent 5-year period, 37 had a history of RRP. We compared the characteristics and surgical outcomes of the patients who had undergone RRP (post-RRP group) with those who had not (non-RRP group).

RESULTS

All post-RRP hernias were treated by MP. The 37 post-RRP patients had a collective 41 hernias, 40 of which were of the indirect type. The side affected by the hernia did not differ significantly between the groups. We compared the short-term surgical outcomes of the indirect post-RRP hernias vs. the indirect non-RPP hernias without recurrence and incarceration. The operation times, postoperative hospital stay, and mobility rates did not differ significantly between the two groups. The blood loss was almost equal in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Inguinal hernia repair after RRP may be difficult because of inflammatory changes in the preperitoneal cavity, but the surgical outcomes of MP were equivalent in patients with or without a history of RPP in this study. MP is a safe and effective method for post-RPP hernia repair.

摘要

目的

我们评估了使用网塞法(MP)修复有耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术(RRP)病史患者腹股沟疝的安全性和有效性。我们还研究了RRP如何影响腹股沟疝的发生及其修复。

方法

在最近5年期间接受腹股沟疝修补术的488例成年男性患者中,37例有RRP病史。我们比较了接受RRP的患者(RRP术后组)和未接受RRP的患者(非RRP组)的特征和手术结果。

结果

所有RRP术后疝均采用MP治疗。37例RRP术后患者共有41例疝,其中40例为间接型。两组间疝累及的侧别无显著差异。我们比较了无复发和嵌顿的间接RRP术后疝与间接非RRP疝的短期手术结果。两组的手术时间、术后住院时间和活动率无显著差异。两组的失血量几乎相等。

结论

RRP术后腹股沟疝修补术可能因腹膜前腔的炎症改变而困难,但在本研究中,MP的手术结果在有或无RRP病史的患者中是等效的。MP是RRP术后疝修补的一种安全有效的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验