• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发一种复杂干预措施以提高健康素养技能。

Development of a complex intervention to improve health literacy skills.

作者信息

Austvoll-Dahlgren Astrid, Danielsen Stein, Opheim Elin, Bjørndal Arild, Reinar Liv Merete, Flottorp Signe, Oxman Andrew David, Helseth Sølvi

机构信息

Prevention, Health Promotion and Organisation Unit, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Health Info Libr J. 2013 Dec;30(4):278-93. doi: 10.1111/hir.12037. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1111/hir.12037
PMID:24251890
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4383652/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Providing insight into the developmental processes involved in building interventions is an important way to ensure methodological transparency and inform future research efforts. The objective of this study was to describe the development of a web portal designed to improve health literacy skills among the public.

METHODS

The web portal was tailored to address three key barriers to obtaining information, using the conceptual frameworks of shared decision-making and evidence-based practice and based on explicit criteria for selecting the content and form of the intervention.

RESULTS

The web portal targeted the general public and took the form of structured sets of tools. Content included: an introduction to research methods, help on how to find evidence-based health information efficiently based on the steps of evidence-based practice, an introduction to critical appraisal, information about patient participation rights in decision-making, and a decision aid for consultations.

CONCLUSIONS

The web portal was designed in a systematic and transparent way and address key barriers to obtaining and acting upon reliable health information. The web portal provides open access to the tools and can be used independently by health care users, or during consultations with health professionals.

摘要

背景

深入了解构建干预措施所涉及的发展过程是确保方法透明性并为未来研究工作提供信息的重要途径。本研究的目的是描述一个旨在提高公众健康素养技能的网络门户的开发过程。

方法

该网络门户是根据共享决策和循证实践的概念框架,并基于选择干预内容和形式的明确标准,量身定制以解决获取信息的三个关键障碍。

结果

该网络门户面向普通公众,采用结构化工具集的形式。内容包括:研究方法介绍、基于循证实践步骤高效查找循证健康信息的帮助、批判性评价介绍、患者参与决策权利信息以及咨询决策辅助工具。

结论

该网络门户以系统且透明的方式设计,解决了获取可靠健康信息并据此采取行动的关键障碍。该网络门户提供对这些工具的开放访问,医疗保健用户可独立使用,或在与医疗专业人员咨询期间使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/300b/4383652/f13973281737/hir0030-0278-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/300b/4383652/5abf310f2721/hir0030-0278-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/300b/4383652/e301444d2fe9/hir0030-0278-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/300b/4383652/acff2e41190e/hir0030-0278-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/300b/4383652/5ea8b4c393cf/hir0030-0278-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/300b/4383652/f13973281737/hir0030-0278-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/300b/4383652/5abf310f2721/hir0030-0278-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/300b/4383652/e301444d2fe9/hir0030-0278-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/300b/4383652/acff2e41190e/hir0030-0278-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/300b/4383652/5ea8b4c393cf/hir0030-0278-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/300b/4383652/f13973281737/hir0030-0278-f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a complex intervention to improve health literacy skills.开发一种复杂干预措施以提高健康素养技能。
Health Info Libr J. 2013 Dec;30(4):278-93. doi: 10.1111/hir.12037. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
2
Evaluation of a web portal for improving public access to evidence-based health information and health literacy skills: a pragmatic trial.评价一个改善公众获取循证健康信息和健康素养技能的门户网站的效果:一项实用试验。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037715. Epub 2012 May 31.
3
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
6
Health care public reporting utilization - user clusters, web trails, and usage barriers on Germany's public reporting portal Weisse-Liste.de.德国公共报告门户网站Weisse-Liste.de上的医疗保健公共报告使用情况——用户群体、网络痕迹及使用障碍
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Apr 21;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0440-6.
7
Interventions for enhancing consumers' online health literacy.提高消费者在线健康素养的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15;2011(6):CD007092. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007092.pub2.
8
Do Web-based Mental Health Literacy Interventions Improve the Mental Health Literacy of Adult Consumers? Results From a Systematic Review.基于网络的心理健康素养干预措施能否提高成年消费者的心理健康素养?一项系统评价的结果
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 20;18(6):e165. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5463.
9
Finding and Exploring Health Information with a Slider-Based User Interface.使用基于滑块的用户界面查找和探索健康信息。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;227:106-12.
10
Health literacy, health information seeking behaviors and internet use among patients attending a private and public clinic in the same geographic area.在同一地理区域的私人诊所和公共诊所就诊的患者的健康素养、健康信息寻求行为和互联网使用情况。
J Community Health. 2014 Feb;39(1):83-9. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9742-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Norwegian public's ability to assess treatment claims: results of a cross-sectional study of critical health literacy.挪威公众评估治疗声明的能力:一项关于关键健康素养的横断面研究结果
F1000Res. 2021 Jul 30;9:179. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.21902.2. eCollection 2020.
2
Challenges and Opportunities for Professional Medical Publications Writers to Contribute to Plain Language Summaries (PLS) in an AI/ML Environment - A Consumer Health Informatics Systematic Review.专业医学出版物作者在人工智能/机器学习环境下为普通语言摘要(PLS)做出贡献所面临的挑战和机遇——消费者健康信息学系统评价。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2024 Jan 11;2023:709-717. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive factors predicting intentions to search for health information: an application of the theory of planned behaviour.预测健康信息搜索意向的认知因素:计划行为理论的应用。
Health Info Libr J. 2012 Dec;29(4):296-308. doi: 10.1111/hir.12006. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
2
Public health nurses' barriers and facilitators to the use of research in consultations about childhood vaccinations.公共卫生护士在儿童疫苗接种咨询中运用研究成果的障碍与促进因素
Scand J Caring Sci. 2012 Jun;26(2):271-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00928.x. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
3
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
Why you should Mini-Med School: Mini-Med School as an intervention to increase health literacy.
为何你应该参加迷你医学院:作为提高健康素养的一种干预措施的迷你医学院。
Can Med Educ J. 2020 Dec 7;11(6):e72-e78. doi: 10.36834/cmej.67817. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
Disentangling health information appraisal competence: Results from an interdisciplinary scoping review and online consultation among Swiss stakeholders.厘清健康信息评估能力:来自瑞士利益相关者的跨学科范围审查和在线咨询的结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0235474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235474. eCollection 2020.
5
Highlighting a valuable dimension in health care librarianship: A systematic review.凸显医疗保健图书馆事业的一个重要维度:一项系统综述。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2018 May 27;32:42. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.32.42. eCollection 2018.
6
"A waste of time without patients": The views of patient representatives attending a workshop in evidence-based practice.“对患者来说是浪费时间”:参加循证实践研讨会的患者代表的观点。
J Evid Based Med. 2018 Aug;11(3):191-199. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12303. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
7
Establishing a library of resources to help people understand key concepts in assessing treatment claims-The "Critical thinking and Appraisal Resource Library" (CARL).建立一个资源库,以帮助人们理解评估治疗主张中的关键概念——“批判性思维与评估资源库”(CARL)。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0178666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178666. eCollection 2017.
8
Interventions and assessment tools addressing key concepts people need to know to appraise claims about treatment effects: a systematic mapping review.针对人们评估治疗效果相关声明所需了解的关键概念的干预措施和评估工具:一项系统映射综述
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 29;5(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0389-z.
9
Assessing Health Literacy in Deaf American Sign Language Users.评估美国手语使用者的健康素养。
J Health Commun. 2015;20 Suppl 2(0 2):92-100. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1066468.
10
Using the Internet to Support Exercise and Diet: A Stratified Norwegian Survey.利用互联网支持运动与饮食:一项挪威分层调查。
Med 2 0. 2015 Aug 26;4(2):e3. doi: 10.2196/med20.4116.
为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
4
Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.低健康素养与健康结局:一项更新的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005.
5
What informs parents' decision-making about childhood vaccinations?是什么影响了家长对儿童疫苗接种的决策?
J Adv Nurs. 2010 Nov;66(11):2421-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05403.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
6
Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.为克服已确定的变革障碍而量身定制的干预措施:对专业实践和医疗保健结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17(3):CD005470. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005470.pub2.
7
Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy.利用互联网促进健康行为改变:对理论基础、行为改变技术的应用以及传播方式对效果影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Feb 17;12(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1376.
8
Training of patient and consumer representatives in the basic competencies of evidence-based medicine: a feasibility study.培训患者和消费者代表掌握循证医学的基本能力:一项可行性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2010 Feb 11;10:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-10-16.
9
ACP Journal Club. Editorial: Accessing preappraised evidence: fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S model.《美国内科医师学会杂志俱乐部》。社论:获取经预先评估的证据:将5S模型微调为6S模型。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Sep 15;151(6):JC3-2, JC3-3. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-6-200909150-02002.
10
Use of the internet for health purposes: trends in Norway 2000-2010.出于健康目的使用互联网:2000 - 2010年挪威的趋势
Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Dec;23(4):691-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00662.x. Epub 2009 May 18.