Suppr超能文献

不同免疫分析法检测抗磷脂抗体的评估:在第 13 届国际抗磷脂抗体大会期间举行的湿实验室研讨会报告。

Evaluation of different immunoassays for the detection of antiphospholipid antibodies: report of a wet workshop during the 13th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies.

机构信息

Universidad Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.

出版信息

Clin Chim Acta. 2014 Jan 20;428:99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Nov 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The performance and standardization of anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β₂ glycoprotein I antibodies (aβ₂GPI) tests for the confirmation of diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) remain a matter of debate and concern. We evaluated the performance of different ELISAs and other new immunoassays for the detection of aCL and aβ₂GPI in a wet workshop at the 13th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Galveston, TX (April 13th, 2010, APLA 2010).

METHODS

Aliquots of 26 un-identified APS or persistently aPL positive serum samples and 21 controls (9 from healthy individuals and 5 from patients with infectious diseases and 7 with various autoimmune diseases) were distributed to all participants/groups. All serum samples were evaluated in various aCL and aβ₂GPI ELISAs, a chemiluminescent immunoassay, a fluoro-enzyme immunoassay, and in a multiplexed immunoassay system. Monoclonal and polyclonal calibrators were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Although not all the assays reported the titers of aCL and aβ₂GPI in the same units, the correlation of positive titers among the assays was good. All aCL and aβ₂GPI tests showed excellent clinical sensitivities, specificities and positive predictive values and good agreement with respect to the levels of the IgG and IgM antibodies, regardless of assay type, or whether tests were done using automated or "manual" systems.

CONCLUSIONS

New methodologies for the detection of aPL look promising and comparable to currently approved ELISA tests. This study provides evidence of progress of efforts of harmonization of tests used to detect aPL.

摘要

背景

抗心磷脂(aCL)和抗β₂糖蛋白 I 抗体(aβ₂GPI)检测用于确诊抗磷脂综合征(APS)的性能和标准化仍然存在争议和关注。我们在德克萨斯州加尔维斯顿第 13 届抗磷脂抗体国际大会(2010 年 4 月 13 日,APLA 2010 年)的一次湿实验室中评估了不同 ELISA 和其他新免疫测定法检测 aCL 和 aβ₂GPI 的性能。

方法

将 26 份未识别的 APS 或持续 aPL 阳性血清样本和 21 份对照样本(9 份来自健康个体,5 份来自传染病患者,7 份来自各种自身免疫性疾病患者)分配给所有参与者/组。所有血清样本均在各种 aCL 和 aβ₂GPI ELISA、化学发光免疫测定法、荧光酶免疫测定法和多重免疫测定系统中进行评估。还评估了单克隆和多克隆校准品。

结果

虽然并非所有检测都以相同单位报告 aCL 和 aβ₂GPI 的滴度,但检测之间的阳性滴度相关性良好。所有 aCL 和 aβ₂GPI 检测均显示出优异的临床敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值,并且与 IgG 和 IgM 抗体的水平具有良好的一致性,无论检测类型如何,或者使用自动化或“手动”系统进行检测。

结论

检测 aPL 的新方法看起来很有前途,并且与当前批准的 ELISA 检测相当。这项研究提供了证据,证明了用于检测 aPL 的检测方法的协调工作取得了进展。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验