Hughes Carmel, Tunney Michael, Bradley Marie C
School of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK, BT9 7BL.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 19;2013(11):CD006354. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006354.pub4.
Nursing homes for older people provide an environment likely to promote the acquisition and spread of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), putting residents at increased risk of colonisation and infection. It is recognised that infection prevention and control strategies are important in preventing and controlling MRSA transmission.
To determine the effects of infection prevention and control strategies for preventing the transmission of MRSA in nursing homes for older people.
In August 2013, for this third update, we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE, The Cochrane Library), Ovid MEDLINE, OVID MEDLINE (In-process and Other Non-Indexed Citations), Ovid EMBASE, EBSCO CINAHL, Web of Science and the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) website. Research in progress was sought through Current Clinical Trials, Gateway to Reseach, and HSRProj (Health Services Research Projects in Progress).
All randomised and controlled clinical trials, controlled before and after studies and interrupted time series studies of infection prevention and control interventions in nursing homes for older people were eligible for inclusion.
Two review authors independently reviewed the results of the searches. Another review author appraised identified papers and undertook data extraction which was checked by a second review author.
For this third update only one study was identified, therefore it was not possible to undertake a meta-analysis. A cluster randomised controlled trial in 32 nursing homes evaluated the effect of an infection control education and training programme on MRSA prevalence. The primary outcome was MRSA prevalence in residents and staff, and a change in infection control audit scores which measured adherence to infection control standards. At the end of the 12 month study, there was no change in MRSA prevalence between intervention and control sites, while mean infection control audit scores were significantly higher in the intervention homes compared with control homes.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of research evaluating the effects on MRSA transmission of infection prevention and control strategies in nursing homes. Rigorous studies should be conducted in nursing homes, involving residents and staff to test interventions that have been specifically designed for this unique environment.
养老院为老年人提供了一个可能促进耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)获得和传播的环境,使居民感染和定植的风险增加。人们认识到,感染预防与控制策略对于预防和控制MRSA传播很重要。
确定感染预防与控制策略对预防养老院老年人中MRSA传播的效果。
2013年8月,为进行本次第三次更新,我们检索了Cochrane伤口小组专业注册库、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL,Cochrane图书馆)、效果评价文摘数据库(DARE,Cochrane图书馆)、Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid MEDLINE(在研及其他未索引引文)、Ovid EMBASE、EBSCO CINAHL、科学引文索引和卫生技术评估(HTA)网站。通过“当前临床试验”“研究网关”和“HSRProj(正在进行的卫生服务研究项目)”查找正在进行的研究。
所有关于养老院感染预防与控制干预措施的随机对照临床试验、前后对照研究和中断时间序列研究均符合纳入标准。
两名综述作者独立审查检索结果。另一名综述作者评估已识别的论文并进行数据提取,由第二名综述作者进行核对。
在本次第三次更新中仅识别出一项研究,因此无法进行荟萃分析。一项在32家养老院进行的整群随机对照试验评估了感染控制教育培训计划对MRSA患病率的影响。主要结局是居民和工作人员中的MRSA患病率,以及衡量对感染控制标准遵守情况的感染控制审核分数的变化。在为期12个月的研究结束时,干预组和对照组的MRSA患病率没有变化,而干预组养老院的平均感染控制审核分数显著高于对照组养老院。
缺乏评估养老院感染预防与控制策略对MRSA传播影响的研究。应在养老院开展严谨的研究,纳入居民和工作人员,以测试专门针对这一独特环境设计的干预措施。