U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Science and Technology Denver Wildlife Research Center, c/o Monell Chemical Senses Center 3500 Market Street, 19104-3308, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
J Chem Ecol. 1991 Dec;17(12):2539-51. doi: 10.1007/BF00994601.
The present set of experiments was designed to explore avian insensitivity to capsaicin. Based upon a molecular model of avian chemosensory repellency, we hypothesized that structural modifications of the basic capsaicin molecule, which is itself not aversive to birds, might produce aversive analogues. To this end, European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) and Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) were given varied concentrations of synthetic capsaicin and four analogues (methyl capsaicin, veratryl amine, veratryl acetamide, vanillyl acetamide) in feeding and drinking tests. The results agreed with a model that we are developing to describe the chemical nature of avian repellents. Synthetic capsaicin and vanillyl acetamide were not repellent to birds, owing to the presence of an acidic phenolic OH group. Conversely, veratryl acetamide was aversive, due to the basic nature of this compound. For rats, repellent effectiveness among compounds was reversed: synthetic capsaicin was the best repellent while veratryl acetamide was the worst. We speculate that this taxonomic reversal may reflect basic differences in trigeminal chemoreception. In any case, it is clear that chemical correlates of mammalian repellents are opposite to those that predict avian repellency.
本实验旨在探索禽类对辣椒素不敏感的原因。基于禽类化学感受器排斥的分子模型,我们假设对基本的辣椒素分子进行结构修饰,原本对鸟类没有刺激性的辣椒素分子可能会产生有刺激性的类似物。为此,欧洲椋鸟(Sturnus vulgaris)和挪威鼠(Rattus norvegicus)被给予不同浓度的合成辣椒素和四种类似物(甲基辣椒素、藜芦胺、藜芦酰胺、香草基乙酰胺)的摄食和饮水实验。结果与我们正在开发的描述鸟类驱避剂化学性质的模型一致。由于存在酸性酚羟基,合成辣椒素和香草基乙酰胺对鸟类没有驱避性。相反,由于该化合物的碱性,藜芦酰胺是有刺激性的。对于大鼠,化合物的驱避效果相反:合成辣椒素是最好的驱避剂,而藜芦酰胺是最差的。我们推测这种分类学上的逆转可能反映了三叉神经化学感觉的基本差异。无论如何,很明显,哺乳动物驱避剂的化学相关性与预测鸟类驱避性的化学相关性相反。