Bassett Elwin C, Kholmovski Eugene G, Wilson Brent D, DiBella Edward V R, Dosdall Derek J, Ranjan Ravi, McGann Christopher J, Kim Daniel
Department of Physics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA; UCAIR, Department of Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
NMR Biomed. 2014 Feb;27(2):175-82. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3049. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
Electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated breath-hold cine MRI is considered to be the gold standard test for the assessment of cardiac function. However, it may fail in patients with arrhythmia, impaired breath-hold capacity and poor ECG gating. Although ungated real-time cine MRI may mitigate these problems, commercially available real-time cine MRI pulse sequences using parallel imaging typically yield relatively poor spatiotemporal resolution because of their low image acquisition efficiency. As an extension of our previous work, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic quality and accuracy of eight-fold-accelerated real-time cine MRI with compressed sensing (CS) for the quantification of cardiac function in tachycardia, where it is challenging for real-time cine MRI to provide sufficient spatiotemporal resolution. We evaluated the performances of eight-fold-accelerated cine MRI with CS, three-fold-accelerated real-time cine MRI with temporal generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (TGRAPPA) and ECG-gated breath-hold cine MRI in 21 large animals with tachycardia (mean heart rate, 104 beats per minute) at 3T. For each cine MRI method, two expert readers evaluated the diagnostic quality in four categories (image quality, temporal fidelity of wall motion, artifacts and apparent noise) using a Likert scale (1-5, worst to best). One reader evaluated the left ventricular functional parameters. The diagnostic quality scores were significantly different between the three cine pulse sequences, except for the artifact level between CS and TGRAPPA real-time cine MRI. Both ECG-gated breath-hold cine MRI and eight-fold accelerated real-time cine MRI yielded all four scores of ≥ 3.0 (acceptable), whereas three-fold-accelerated real-time cine MRI yielded all scores below 3.0, except for artifact (3.0). The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurements agreed better between ECG-gated cine MRI and eight-fold-accelerated real-time cine MRI (mean difference, -1.6%) than between ECG-gated cine MRI and three-fold-accelerated real-time cine MRI (mean difference, -5.7%). Eight-fold-accelerated real-time cine MRI with CS yields acceptable diagnostic quality and relatively accurate LVEF measurements in the challenging setting of tachycardia.
心电图(ECG)门控屏气电影磁共振成像(MRI)被认为是评估心脏功能的金标准检查。然而,对于心律失常、屏气能力受损和心电图门控不佳的患者,该检查可能会失败。尽管非门控实时电影MRI可以缓解这些问题,但市售的使用并行成像的实时电影MRI脉冲序列由于其低图像采集效率,通常产生相对较差的时空分辨率。作为我们先前工作的延伸,本研究的目的是评估八倍加速压缩感知(CS)实时电影MRI在心动过速时定量心脏功能的诊断质量和准确性,此时实时电影MRI提供足够的时空分辨率具有挑战性。我们在3T场强下,对21只患有心动过速(平均心率为每分钟104次)的大型动物,评估了八倍加速CS电影MRI、三倍加速时间广义自校准部分并行采集(TGRAPPA)实时电影MRI和ECG门控屏气电影MRI的性能。对于每种电影MRI方法,两名专家读者使用李克特量表(1-5,从最差到最佳)对四类(图像质量、壁运动的时间保真度、伪影和明显噪声)的诊断质量进行评估。一名读者评估左心室功能参数。除了CS和TGRAPPA实时电影MRI之间的伪影水平外,三种电影脉冲序列之间的诊断质量得分有显著差异。ECG门控屏气电影MRI和八倍加速实时电影MRI的所有四项得分均≥3.0(可接受),而三倍加速实时电影MRI除伪影(3.0)外,所有得分均低于3.0。与ECG门控电影MRI和三倍加速实时电影MRI之间(平均差异为-5.7%)相比,ECG门控电影MRI和八倍加速实时电影MRI之间左心室射血分数(LVEF)测量值的一致性更好(平均差异为-1.6%)。在心动过速这一具有挑战性的情况下,八倍加速CS实时电影MRI产生可接受的诊断质量和相对准确的LVEF测量值。