Price Charles A, Munro Peter R T, Weitz Joshua S
School of Plant Biology , University of Western Australia, Crawley, Perth 6009, Australia.
Plant Physiol. 2014 Jan;164(1):173-80. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.224451. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
Leaf vein density (LVD) has garnered considerable attention of late, with numerous studies linking it to the physiology, ecology, and evolution of land plants. Despite this increased attention, little consideration has been given to the effects of measurement methods on estimation of LVD. Here, we focus on the relationship between measurement methods and estimates of LVD. We examine the dependence of LVD on magnification, field of view (FOV), and image resolution. We first show that estimates of LVD increase with increasing image magnification and resolution. We then demonstrate that estimates of LVD are higher with higher variance at small FOV, approaching asymptotic values as the FOV increases. We demonstrate that these effects arise due to three primary factors: (1) the tradeoff between FOV and magnification; (2) geometric effects of lattices at small scales; and; (3) the hierarchical nature of leaf vein networks. Our results help to explain differences in previously published studies and highlight the importance of using consistent magnification and scale, when possible, when comparing LVD and other quantitative measures of venation structure across leaves.
叶脉密度(LVD)近来受到了相当多的关注,众多研究将其与陆地植物的生理学、生态学及进化联系起来。尽管关注度有所提高,但测量方法对LVD估计的影响却很少有人考虑。在此,我们聚焦于测量方法与LVD估计值之间的关系。我们研究了LVD对放大倍数、视野(FOV)和图像分辨率的依赖性。我们首先表明,LVD估计值随图像放大倍数和分辨率的增加而增加。然后我们证明,在小视野下,LVD估计值具有更高的方差,随着视野增大接近渐近值。我们证明这些影响源于三个主要因素:(1)视野与放大倍数之间的权衡;(2)小尺度下晶格的几何效应;以及(3)叶脉网络的层次性质。我们的结果有助于解释先前发表研究中的差异,并强调在比较不同叶片的LVD和其他叶脉结构定量指标时,尽可能使用一致的放大倍数和尺度的重要性。