Suppr超能文献

SSRIs 类药物致 QT 延长风险的比较。

A comparison of the risk of QT prolongation among SSRIs.

机构信息

University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Oct;47(10):1330-41. doi: 10.1177/1060028013501994. Epub 2013 Oct 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To report QT prolongation potential in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in order to advise clinicians on safe use of SSRIs other than citalopram in light of citalopram warnings.

DATA SOURCES

Primary literature and case reports were identified through a systematic search. Data from drug manufacturers, package inserts, and the ArizonaCERT database were also utilized.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

English-language studies and case reports were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Studies demonstrate possible dose-related clinically significant QT prolongation with escitalopram. Fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, and sertraline at traditional doses demonstrate a lack of clinically significant increases in QTc in the majority of studies. Further, paroxetine monotherapy shows a lack of clinically significant QTc prolongation in all studies. However, case reports or reporting tools still link these SSRIs with QTc prolongation. Fluoxetine, escitalopram, and sertraline used in post-acute coronary syndrome patients did not demonstrate risk of QTc prolongation.

CONCLUSION

For clinicians who choose not to use citalopram due to recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations, other antidepressants within this class may be considered. When citalopram is not utilized based on risk factors for TdP, use of escitalopram is not likely the safest alternative. Based on current literature, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, and sertraline appear to have similar, low risk for QT prolongation, and paroxetine appears to have the lowest risk. However, there are significant limitations in interpreting the studies, including varying definitions of significant QT prolongation. Therefore, choice of an alternative SSRI should be based on individual risk factors for arrhythmias and other patient-specific factors.

摘要

目的

报告选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)的 QT 延长潜力,以便根据西酞普兰的警告,就安全使用除西酞普兰以外的 SSRIs 为临床医生提供建议。

资料来源

通过系统检索,确定了主要文献和病例报告。还利用了来自药品制造商、包装说明书和亚利桑那州 CERT 数据库的数据。

研究选择和数据提取

纳入了英语研究和病例报告。

资料综合

研究表明,依他普仑可能存在剂量相关的临床显著 QT 延长。在大多数研究中,氟西汀、氟伏沙明和舍曲林在传统剂量下并未显示出 QTc 显著增加。此外,在所有研究中,帕罗西汀单药治疗均未显示出 QTc 延长的临床意义。然而,病例报告或报告工具仍将这些 SSRIs 与 QTc 延长联系起来。在急性冠脉综合征后使用氟西汀、依他普仑和舍曲林并未显示出 QTc 延长的风险。

结论

对于因最近的食品和药物管理局(FDA)建议而不愿使用西酞普兰的临床医生来说,可以考虑使用该类别的其他抗抑郁药。当由于 TdP 的风险因素而不使用西酞普兰时,使用依他普仑不太可能是最安全的替代方法。根据目前的文献,氟西汀、氟伏沙明和舍曲林似乎具有相似的、低风险的 QT 延长,而帕罗西汀的风险最低。然而,在解释这些研究时存在重大限制,包括对显著 QT 延长的不同定义。因此,替代 SSRIs 的选择应基于心律失常和其他患者特定因素的个体风险因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验