Suppr超能文献

测量自闭症谱系障碍青少年的重复行为作为治疗终点。

Measuring repetitive behaviors as a treatment endpoint in youth with autism spectrum disorder.

机构信息

Emory University, USA

The Ohio State University, USA.

出版信息

Autism. 2015 Jan;19(1):38-52. doi: 10.1177/1362361313510069. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

Abstract

Restricted interests and repetitive behaviors vary widely in type, frequency, and intensity among children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. They can be stigmatizing and interfere with more constructive activities. Accordingly, restricted interests and repetitive behaviors may be a target of intervention. Several standardized instruments have been developed to assess restricted interests and repetitive behaviors in the autism spectrum disorder population, but the rigor of psychometric assessment is variable. This article evaluated the readiness of available measures for use as outcome measures in clinical trials. The Autism Speaks Foundation assembled a panel of experts to examine available instruments used to measure restricted interests and repetitive behaviors in youth with autism spectrum disorder. The panel held monthly conference calls and two face-to-face meetings over 14 months to develop and apply evaluative criteria for available instruments. Twenty-four instruments were evaluated and five were considered "appropriate with conditions" for use as outcome measures in clinical trials. Ideally, primary outcome measures should be relevant to the clinical target, be reliable and valid, and cover the symptom domain without being burdensome to subjects. The goal of the report was to promote consensus across funding agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and clinical investigators about advantages and disadvantages of existing outcome measures.

摘要

自闭症谱系障碍儿童和青少年的兴趣受限和重复行为在类型、频率和强度上差异很大。这些行为具有污名化的特点,并且会干扰更具建设性的活动。因此,兴趣受限和重复行为可能是干预的目标。已经开发了几种标准化工具来评估自闭症谱系障碍人群中的受限兴趣和重复行为,但心理测量评估的严谨性各不相同。本文评估了现有测量工具作为临床试验中结局测量的准备情况。自闭症代言人基金会召集了一组专家,以检查用于评估自闭症谱系障碍青少年的受限兴趣和重复行为的现有工具。该小组每月举行一次电话会议,并在 14 个月内举行了两次面对面会议,以制定和应用现有工具的评估标准。评估了 24 种工具,其中 5 种被认为“有条件适用”,可作为临床试验中的结局测量。理想情况下,主要结局测量应与临床目标相关,具有可靠性和有效性,并涵盖症状领域,而不会给受试者带来负担。该报告的目的是促进资助机构、制药公司和临床研究人员对现有结局测量的优缺点达成共识。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验