Suppr超能文献

等长收缩过程中肩部屈曲角度对上肢肌肉募集的影响。

The Effect of Shoulder Flexion Angles on the Recruitment of Upper-extremity Muscles during Isometric Contraction.

作者信息

Moon Jeheon, Shin Insik, Kang Myoungsoo, Kim Yeonghun, Lee Kunwoo, Park Jaewoo, Kim Kyungnam, Hong Daehie, Koo Dohoon, O'sullivan David

机构信息

Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Physical Education, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Phys Ther Sci. 2013 Oct;25(10):1299-301. doi: 10.1589/jpts.25.1299. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in muscle activation patterns of the biceps brachii (BB) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscles, while measuring the resultant force (RF) at different shoulder flexion angles. [Subjects] Thirteen healthy males (age 24.85±3.4 years, weight; 77.8±7.9 kg; height, 1.7±0.05 m) were enrolled in this study. [Methods] The resultant force was measured by a force transducer . The elbow angle remained constant and the flexion shoulder angle was changed (30°, 45°, 60°, 75° and 90°). [Results] The results of the surface EMG show the largest muscle activities occurred at a shoulder flexion of 75° for BB and 90° for FCR. The largest resultant force was measured at a shoulder flexion angle of 75°. We conclude, that when performing the biceps curl exercise using an arm curl machine, the shoulder should be flexed at 75° to maximize the focus of the exercise for the BB. [Conclusion] These results are useful from the perspective of design as they highlight the differences in the muscle activation of BB and FCR with postural change. Ultimately this knowledge can be used in the design of rehabilitation training for the shoulder as they show that posture can affect muscle activation.

摘要

本研究的目的是在测量不同肩部屈曲角度下的合力(RF)时,调查肱二头肌(BB)和桡侧腕屈肌(FCR)的肌肉激活模式差异。[受试者] 13名健康男性(年龄24.85±3.4岁,体重77.8±7.9千克;身高1.7±0.05米)参与了本研究。[方法] 用测力传感器测量合力。肘关节角度保持恒定,改变肩部屈曲角度(30°、45°、60°、75°和90°)。[结果] 表面肌电图结果显示,BB在肩部屈曲75°时肌肉活动最大,FCR在肩部屈曲90°时肌肉活动最大。在肩部屈曲75°时测得最大合力。我们得出结论,在使用臂弯举器械进行二头肌弯举练习时,肩部应屈曲75°,以使练习对BB的专注度最大化。[结论] 这些结果从设计角度来看很有用,因为它们突出了BB和FCR的肌肉激活随姿势变化的差异。最终,这些知识可用于肩部康复训练的设计,因为它们表明姿势会影响肌肉激活。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
The long head of biceps at the shoulder: a scoping review.肩部肱二头肌长头:范围界定综述。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Mar 28;24(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06346-5.

本文引用的文献

4
Kinetic comparison of free weight and machine power cleans.自由重量与器械高翻的动力学比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Nov;22(6):1785-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318185f068.
6
Maximum isometric arm forces in the horizontal plane.水平面内的最大等长手臂力量。
J Biomech. 2006;39(4):708-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.01.004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验