• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉表征风格在问题解决中的作用:认知过程视角

The effect of visual representation style in problem-solving: a perspective from cognitive processes.

作者信息

Nyamsuren Enkhbold, Taatgen Niels A

机构信息

Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Nov 15;8(11):e80550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080550. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0080550
PMID:24260415
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3829871/
Abstract

Using results from a controlled experiment and simulations based on cognitive models, we show that visual presentation style can have a significant impact on performance in a complex problem-solving task. We compared subject performances in two isomorphic, but visually different, tasks based on a card game of SET. Although subjects used the same strategy in both tasks, the difference in presentation style resulted in radically different reaction times and significant deviations in scanpath patterns in the two tasks. Results from our study indicate that low-level subconscious visual processes, such as differential acuity in peripheral vision and low-level iconic memory, can have indirect, but significant effects on decision making during a problem-solving task. We have developed two ACT-R models that employ the same basic strategy but deal with different presentations styles. Our ACT-R models confirm that changes in low-level visual processes triggered by changes in presentation style can propagate to higher-level cognitive processes. Such a domino effect can significantly affect reaction times and eye movements, without affecting the overall strategy of problem solving.

摘要

通过一个对照实验的结果以及基于认知模型的模拟,我们表明视觉呈现方式会对复杂问题解决任务中的表现产生重大影响。我们基于“集中注意力”纸牌游戏比较了两个同构但视觉上不同的任务中的受试者表现。尽管受试者在两个任务中使用相同策略,但呈现方式的差异导致了截然不同的反应时间以及两个任务中扫描路径模式的显著偏差。我们的研究结果表明,低层次的潜意识视觉过程,如周边视觉中的差异敏锐度和低层次的图像记忆,在问题解决任务中对决策会产生间接但显著的影响。我们开发了两个ACT-R模型,它们采用相同的基本策略,但处理不同的呈现方式。我们的ACT-R模型证实,由呈现方式变化引发的低层次视觉过程变化可以传播到更高层次的认知过程。这种多米诺效应会显著影响反应时间和眼动,而不影响问题解决的整体策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/4488b2484d6a/pone.0080550.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/95e9445f606d/pone.0080550.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/abdfbfafe5c1/pone.0080550.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/a315012ec828/pone.0080550.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/a4fa848c05cf/pone.0080550.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/b6f832a9bdaf/pone.0080550.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/c4827da2e9ac/pone.0080550.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/eb4fb5c6876c/pone.0080550.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/c20dd529711e/pone.0080550.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/81dbc6a056e9/pone.0080550.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/4a2a895f1b02/pone.0080550.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/9f4ea8006ad4/pone.0080550.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/58cad5b60c66/pone.0080550.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/d0927a973faf/pone.0080550.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/dd0e67369f8e/pone.0080550.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/4488b2484d6a/pone.0080550.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/95e9445f606d/pone.0080550.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/abdfbfafe5c1/pone.0080550.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/a315012ec828/pone.0080550.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/a4fa848c05cf/pone.0080550.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/b6f832a9bdaf/pone.0080550.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/c4827da2e9ac/pone.0080550.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/eb4fb5c6876c/pone.0080550.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/c20dd529711e/pone.0080550.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/81dbc6a056e9/pone.0080550.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/4a2a895f1b02/pone.0080550.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/9f4ea8006ad4/pone.0080550.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/58cad5b60c66/pone.0080550.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/d0927a973faf/pone.0080550.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/dd0e67369f8e/pone.0080550.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ba/3829871/4488b2484d6a/pone.0080550.g015.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of visual representation style in problem-solving: a perspective from cognitive processes.视觉表征风格在问题解决中的作用:认知过程视角
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 15;8(11):e80550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080550. eCollection 2013.
2
Gesturing during mental problem solving reduces eye movements, especially for individuals with lower visual working memory capacity.在解决心理问题时做手势会减少眼球运动,尤其是对于视觉工作记忆容量较低的个体。
Cogn Process. 2016 Aug;17(3):269-77. doi: 10.1007/s10339-016-0757-6. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
3
Set as an instance of a real-world visual-cognitive task.设定为一个真实视觉认知任务的实例。
Cogn Sci. 2013 Jan-Feb;37(1):146-75. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12001.
4
Visuospatial over verbal demands in predicting Tower of London planning tasks.视空间任务优于言语任务预测塔科马规划任务。
Br J Psychol. 2012 Feb;103(1):98-116. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02049.x. Epub 2011 Jun 6.
5
Which cognitive tools do we prefer to use, and is that preference rational?我们更倾向于使用哪些认知工具,这种偏好是否合理?
Cognition. 2019 May;186:108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
6
The problem state: a cognitive bottleneck in multitasking.问题状态:多任务处理中的认知瓶颈。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Mar;36(2):363-82. doi: 10.1037/a0018106.
7
Eye movements and visuospatial problem solving: identifying separable phases of complex cognition.眼球运动与视觉空间问题解决:识别复杂认知的可分离阶段。
Psychophysiology. 2009 Jul;46(4):818-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00821.x. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
8
What's the Problem? Familiarity Working Memory, and Transfer in a Problem-Solving Task.问题是什么?在解决问题任务中的熟悉度、工作记忆与迁移。
Am J Psychol. 2015 Summer;128(2):147-57. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.2.0147.
9
Peripheral vision and crowding in mental maze-solving.心理迷宫求解中的周边视觉与拥挤现象
J Vis. 2024 Apr 1;24(4):22. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.4.22.
10
Co-thought gesturing supports more complex problem solving in subjects with lower visual working-memory capacity.共同思维手势支持视觉工作记忆能力较低的被试更复杂的问题解决。
Psychol Res. 2020 Mar;84(2):502-513. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1065-9. Epub 2018 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
New approaches to the analysis of eye movement behaviour across expertise while viewing brain MRIs.在查看脑部核磁共振成像时,分析不同专业水平下眼动行为的新方法。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018;3(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0097-4. Epub 2018 Apr 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Set as an instance of a real-world visual-cognitive task.设定为一个真实视觉认知任务的实例。
Cogn Sci. 2013 Jan-Feb;37(1):146-75. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12001.
2
ScanMatch: a novel method for comparing fixation sequences.ScanMatch:一种比较注视序列的新方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2010 Aug;42(3):692-700. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.692.
3
Neural mechanisms underlying the impact of visual distraction on retrieval of long-term memory.视觉干扰对长期记忆提取影响的神经机制。
J Neurosci. 2010 Jun 23;30(25):8541-50. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1478-10.2010.
4
Set recognition as a window to perceptual and cognitive processes.将识别视为感知和认知过程的一扇窗口。
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Oct;70(7):1165-84. doi: 10.3758/PP.70.7.1165.
5
Threaded cognition: an integrated theory of concurrent multitasking.线程认知:并发多任务处理的综合理论
Psychol Rev. 2008 Jan;115(1):101-30. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.101.
6
The world of competitive Scrabble: Novice and expert differences in visuopatial and verbal abilities.拼字游戏竞赛的世界:新手与专家在视觉空间和语言能力上的差异。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2007 Jun;13(2):79-94. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.13.2.79.
7
Fundamental components of attention.注意力的基本组成部分。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:57-78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094256.
8
The emergence of semantic categorization in early visual processing: ERP indices of animal vs. artifact recognition.早期视觉处理中语义分类的出现:动物与人工制品识别的事件相关电位指标。
BMC Neurosci. 2007 Apr 5;8:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-8-24.
9
What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?哪些属性引导视觉注意力的部署,以及它们是如何做到的?
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Jun;5(6):495-501. doi: 10.1038/nrn1411.
10
Preserving informational separability and violating decisional separability in facial perception and recognition.在面部感知与识别中保持信息可分离性并违背决策可分离性。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1106-18. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1106.