Suppr超能文献

使用一种简单的筛查设备对腹主动脉瘤进行筛查。

Screening for aneurysms of the abdominal aorta using a simple screening device.

作者信息

Brakel J W, Berendsen T A, Callenbach P M C, van der Burgh J, Hissink R J, van den Berg M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Treant Zorggroep, Boermarkeweg 60, 7824 AA, Emmen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Ultrasound J. 2020 Nov 11;12(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13089-020-00192-5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Several countries advocate screening for aneurysms of the abdominal aorta (AAA) in selected patients. In the Netherlands, routine screening is currently under review by the National Health Council. In any screening programme, cost-efficiency and accuracy are key. In this study, we evaluate the Aorta Scan (Verathon, Amsterdam, Netherlands), a cost-effective and easy-to-use screening device based on bladder scan technology, which enables untrained personnel to screen for AAA.

METHODS

We subjected 117 patients to an Aorta Scan and compared the results to the gold standard (abdominal ultrasound). We used statistical analysis to determine sensitivity and specificity of the Aorta Scan, as well as the positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and inter-test agreement (Kappa).

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity were 0.86 and 0.98, respectively. Positive predictive value was 0.98 and negative predictive value was 0.88. Accuracy was determined at 0.92 and the Kappa value was 0.85. When waist-hip circumferences (WHC) of > 115 cm were excluded, sensitivity raised to 0.96, specificity stayed 0.98, positive and negative predictive value were 0.98 and 0.96, respectively, accuracy to 0.97, and Kappa to 0.94.

CONCLUSION

Herein, we show that the Aorta Scan is a cost-effective and very accurate screening tool, especially in patients with WHC below 115 cm, which makes it a suitable candidate for implementation into clinical practice, specifically in the setting of screening selected populations for the presence of AAA.

摘要

引言

几个国家提倡对特定患者进行腹主动脉瘤(AAA)筛查。在荷兰,国家卫生委员会目前正在审查常规筛查。在任何筛查计划中,成本效益和准确性都是关键。在本研究中,我们评估了主动脉扫描(Verathon,阿姆斯特丹,荷兰),这是一种基于膀胱扫描技术的经济高效且易于使用的筛查设备,使未经培训的人员能够筛查AAA。

方法

我们对117名患者进行了主动脉扫描,并将结果与金标准(腹部超声)进行比较。我们使用统计分析来确定主动脉扫描的敏感性和特异性,以及阳性和阴性预测值、准确性和检验间一致性(Kappa)。

结果

敏感性和特异性分别为0.86和0.98。阳性预测值为0.98,阴性预测值为0.88。准确性确定为0.92,Kappa值为0.85。当排除腰臀围(WHC)>115 cm的患者时,敏感性提高到0.96,特异性保持在0.98,阳性和阴性预测值分别为0.98和0.96,准确性为0.97,Kappa为0.94。

结论

在此,我们表明主动脉扫描是一种经济高效且非常准确的筛查工具,特别是在WHC低于115 cm的患者中,这使其成为临床实践中实施的合适候选者,特别是在筛查特定人群是否存在AAA的情况下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd5/7658288/5ec5b9fa1281/13089_2020_192_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验