Department of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, and Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mt. Sinai, New York, NY 10029.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 10;110(50):20040-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320322110. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
Controlling learned defensive responses through extinction does not alter the threat memory itself, but rather regulates its expression via inhibitory influence of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) over amygdala. Individual differences in amygdala-PFC circuitry function have been linked to trait anxiety and posttraumatic stress disorder. This finding suggests that exposure-based techniques may actually be least effective in those who suffer from anxiety disorders. A theoretical advantage of techniques influencing reconsolidation of threat memories is that the threat representation is altered, potentially diminishing reliance on this PFC circuitry, resulting in a more persistent reduction of defensive reactions. We hypothesized that timing extinction to coincide with threat memory reconsolidation would prevent the return of defensive reactions and diminish PFC involvement. Two conditioned stimuli (CS) were paired with shock and the third was not. A day later, one stimulus (reminded CS+) but not the other (nonreminded CS+) was presented 10 min before extinction to reactivate the threat memory, followed by extinction training for all CSs. The recovery of the threat memory was tested 24 h later. Extinction of the nonreminded CS+ (i.e., standard extinction) engaged the PFC, as previously shown, but extinction of the reminded CS+ (i.e., extinction during reconsolidation) did not. Moreover, only the nonreminded CS+ memory recovered on day 3. These results suggest that extinction during reconsolidation prevents the return of defensive reactions and diminishes PFC involvement. Reducing the necessity of the PFC-amygdala circuitry to control defensive reactions may help overcome a primary obstacle in the long-term efficacy of current treatments for anxiety disorders.
通过消退来控制习得性防御反应并不会改变威胁记忆本身,而是通过前额叶皮层(PFC)对杏仁核的抑制性影响来调节其表达。杏仁核-前额叶皮层回路功能的个体差异与特质焦虑和创伤后应激障碍有关。这一发现表明,基于暴露的技术实际上对那些患有焦虑症的人最没有效果。影响威胁记忆再巩固的技术具有理论优势,因为威胁表示被改变,可能减少对该 PFC 回路的依赖,从而导致防御反应更持久地减少。我们假设,将消退与威胁记忆再巩固同时进行,将阻止防御反应的恢复并减少 PFC 的参与。两个条件刺激(CS)与电击配对,第三个则没有。一天后,一个刺激(提醒 CS+)但不是另一个(未提醒 CS+)在消退前 10 分钟呈现,以重新激活威胁记忆,然后对所有 CS 进行消退训练。24 小时后测试威胁记忆的恢复情况。如前所述,非提醒 CS+的消退(即标准消退)会激活 PFC,但提醒 CS+的消退(即再巩固期间的消退)则不会。此外,只有非提醒 CS+记忆在第 3 天恢复。这些结果表明,再巩固期间的消退可防止防御反应的恢复,并减少 PFC 的参与。减少 PFC-杏仁核回路控制防御反应的必要性可能有助于克服当前焦虑症治疗长期疗效的主要障碍。