Ito Shuhei, Yamaguchi Shohei, Saeki Hiroshi, Oki Eiji, Tayama Eiki, Ikejiri Koji, Morita Masaru, Maehara Yoshihiko
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan,
World J Surg. 2014 May;38(5):1051-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2375-0.
A major concern with the use of the right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) as the graft for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the potential for injury, which can result in critical myocardial ischemia during future abdominal surgery.
We examined the availability of preoperative image evaluation, preoperative recognition of the RGEA graft, and operative findings such as graft identification, graft injury, and cardiac events in 11 patients who underwent abdominal surgery after CABG using the RGEA as the graft.
Prior to the abdominal surgery, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) was performed in all 11 patients, while coronary angiography or three-dimensional CT angiography was performed in five patients. We detected the RGEA graft retrospectively in nine of ten patients in whom the images from contrast-enhanced CT were still available. Among the seven patients whose RGEA grafts were in the operative field, the RGEA graft was identified in five patients, while the RGEA graft was not identified in the remaining two patients because of adhesions. There were no intraoperative cardiac events in any of the 11 patients.
It is important to determine whether an RGEA graft is present when repeat laparotomy is required after CABG. In cases where an RGEA graft is present, it is essential to evaluate the patency and location of the graft since this will be crucial for planning the reoperation strategy. Preoperative recognition and evaluation of the RGEA graft can help avoid graft injury, even if the graft cannot be detected intraoperatively.
使用胃网膜右动脉(RGEA)作为冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的移植物时,一个主要担忧是存在损伤风险,这可能在未来腹部手术期间导致严重心肌缺血。
我们检查了11例接受以RGEA作为移植物的CABG术后行腹部手术患者的术前影像评估的可行性、术前对RGEA移植物的识别以及手术发现,如移植物识别、移植物损伤和心脏事件。
在腹部手术前,所有11例患者均进行了对比增强计算机断层扫描(CT),5例患者进行了冠状动脉造影或三维CT血管造影。在10例仍有对比增强CT图像的患者中,我们回顾性检测到9例有RGEA移植物。在7例RGEA移植物位于手术视野的患者中,5例识别出了RGEA移植物,其余2例因粘连未识别出RGEA移植物。11例患者中均未发生术中心脏事件。
CABG术后需要再次剖腹手术时,确定是否存在RGEA移植物很重要。在存在RGEA移植物的情况下,评估移植物的通畅性和位置至关重要,因为这对制定再次手术策略至关重要。术前识别和评估RGEA移植物有助于避免移植物损伤,即使术中无法检测到移植物。