Catherine L Wall, Andrew S Day, Department of Paediatrics, University of Otago, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov 21;19(43):7652-60. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7652.
Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is well-established as a first line therapy instead of corticosteroid (CS) therapy to treat active Crohn's disease (CD) in children. It also has been shown to have benefits over and above induction of disease remission in paediatric populations. However, other than in Japanese populations, this intervention is not routinely utilised in adults. To investigate potential reasons for variation in response between adult studies of EEN and CS therapy. The Ovid database was searched over a 6-mo period. Articles directly comparing EEN and CS therapy in adults were included. Eleven articles were identified. EEN therapy remission rates varied considerably. Poor compliance with EEN therapy due to unpalatable formula was an issue in half of the studies. Remission rates of studies that only included patients with previously untreated/new CD were higher than studies including patients with both existing and new disease. There was limited evidence to determine if disease location, duration of disease or age of diagnosis affected EEN therapy outcomes. There is some evidence to support the use of EEN as a treatment option for a select group of adults, namely those motivated to adhere to an EEN regimen and possibly those newly diagnosed with CD. In addition, the use of more palatable formulas could improve treatment compliance.
肠内营养(EEN)是一种成熟的治疗方法,可作为治疗儿童活动性克罗恩病(CD)的一线治疗方法,而不是皮质类固醇(CS)治疗。它在诱导儿科人群疾病缓解方面也具有益处。然而,除了在日本人群中,这种干预措施在成年人中并不常规使用。为了研究 EEN 和 CS 治疗成人研究之间反应差异的潜在原因。在 6 个月的时间里对 Ovid 数据库进行了搜索。纳入了直接比较 EEN 和 CS 治疗成人的文章。确定了 11 篇文章。EEN 治疗缓解率差异很大。由于配方不可口,有一半的研究存在 EEN 治疗依从性差的问题。仅包括初治/新发 CD 患者的研究的缓解率高于包括既有和新发疾病患者的研究。有有限的证据来确定疾病部位、疾病持续时间或诊断年龄是否影响 EEN 治疗结果。有一些证据支持将 EEN 作为一种治疗选择,适用于特定的成年人群体,即那些有动力坚持 EEN 治疗方案的人群,可能是那些新诊断为 CD 的人群。此外,使用更可口的配方可以提高治疗依从性。