Suppr超能文献

鼻中隔夹:鼻中隔手术后鼻腔填塞的替代方法?

Nasal septal clips: an alternative to nasal packing after septal surgery?

作者信息

Veluswamy Anand, Handa Sachin, Shivaswamy Santosh

机构信息

MCV ENT Trust Hospital, 115, Palaghat Road, Pollachi, Tamil Nadu 642001 India.

出版信息

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Dec;64(4):346-50. doi: 10.1007/s12070-011-0388-2. Epub 2011 Nov 30.

Abstract

Surgeons have debated since decades on the efficacy or inefficacy of nasal packing yet it is considered routine after septal surgery. Various types of septal splints have been tried as an alternative to nasal packs but most of them need to be sutured around the septum which requires a meticulous approach and expertise. Our aim is to assess and compare the immediate post-operative morbidity and the eventual outcome of septal surgery while using glove finger packs with that of septal clips with splints. This comparative study was done at MCV Memorial ENT Trust Hospital on 80 patients who were diagnosed to have DNS and underwent septal surgery. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A (n = 40) constituted of patients who had glove finger packs and Group B (n = 40) constituted of patients who had septal clips. In the immediate post-operative period patients were assessed for pain, headache, dysphagia, epiphora, dryness of mouth and post-operative bleed. On the first post-operative night, patients were assessed for oxygen saturation. Patients underwent tympanometry just before pack/splint removal and on reviews if the same was abnormal. Post-operative complications like septal perforation and synechiae were noted for both groups and compared. We found that the incidence of pain and various other signs and symptoms was significantly higher in Group A. The difference in the complication rates among the two groups was not statistically significant. We observed that nasal packing is a cause for significant morbidity and discomfort in the immediate post-operative period and does not give any added advantage over septal clips used in our study as far as the final outcome is concerned. Nasal septal clips with splints are a useful alternative to existing techniques of flap approximation after septal surgery. The method is not expensive and needs no special expertise.

摘要

几十年来,外科医生一直在争论鼻腔填塞的有效性或无效性,但鼻中隔手术后仍将其视为常规操作。人们尝试了各种类型的鼻中隔夹板作为鼻腔填塞的替代方法,但大多数都需要在鼻中隔周围缝合,这需要细致的操作和专业技能。我们的目的是评估并比较使用手套指套填塞与带夹板的鼻中隔夹进行鼻中隔手术后的即刻术后发病率和最终结果。这项对比研究在MCV纪念耳鼻喉信托医院对80例被诊断患有鼻中隔偏曲并接受鼻中隔手术的患者进行。患者被分为两组。A组(n = 40)由使用手套指套填塞的患者组成,B组(n = 40)由使用鼻中隔夹的患者组成。在术后即刻,对患者进行疼痛、头痛、吞咽困难、流泪、口干和术后出血情况的评估。在术后第一个晚上,对患者进行血氧饱和度评估。在取出填塞物/夹板前以及复查时(如果异常)对患者进行鼓室导抗图检查。记录两组患者的术后并发症,如鼻中隔穿孔和粘连,并进行比较。我们发现A组疼痛及其他各种体征和症状的发生率明显更高。两组之间的并发症发生率差异无统计学意义。我们观察到,鼻腔填塞在术后即刻会导致显著的发病率和不适,就最终结果而言,与我们研究中使用的鼻中隔夹相比并没有任何额外优势。带夹板的鼻中隔夹是鼻中隔手术后现有皮瓣贴合技术的一种有用替代方法。该方法成本不高,且不需要特殊专业技能。

相似文献

1
Nasal septal clips: an alternative to nasal packing after septal surgery?鼻中隔夹:鼻中隔手术后鼻腔填塞的替代方法?
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Dec;64(4):346-50. doi: 10.1007/s12070-011-0388-2. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
7
Use of nasal packs and intranasal septal splints following septoplasty.鼻中隔成形术后鼻填塞物及鼻内鼻中隔夹板的使用。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Oct;38(10):1022-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.05.012. Epub 2009 Jul 4.
8
Trans-septal Suturing Versus Merocel Nasal Packing: A Post Septoplasty Comparison.经鼻中隔缝合术与美罗赛鼻腔填塞术:鼻中隔成形术后的比较
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):937-942. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-02013-6. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
10
The Efficacy of Septal Quilting Sutures Versus Nasal Packing in Septoplasty.鼻中隔缝合术与鼻中隔成形术中鼻腔填塞的疗效比较
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):1713-1717. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02865-6. Epub 2021 Sep 18.

本文引用的文献

2
Surgery of the difficult septum.复杂鼻中隔手术
AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1955 Apr;61(4):419-21. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1955.00720020435007.
5
Packing in endonasal surgery.鼻内手术中的填塞
Am J Otolaryngol. 2001 Sep-Oct;22(5):306-20. doi: 10.1053/ajot.2001.26499.
6
Nasal splints, revisited.鼻夹,再探讨。
J Laryngol Otol. 1999 Aug;113(8):725-7. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100145037.
7
Septal splint with wax plates.带有蜡板的鼻中隔夹板
J Postgrad Med. 1995 Jul-Sep;41(3):70-1.
10
Magnetic intranasal splints.磁性鼻内夹板。
Arch Otolaryngol. 1982 May;108(5):319. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1982.00790530055013.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验