Mental Health Sciences Unit, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, Charles Bell House, 67-73 Riding House Street, London W1W 7EY, United Kingdom.
J Aging Stud. 2013 Dec;27(4):368-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
This paper explores the idea of the 'fourth age' as a form of social imaginary. During the latter half of the twentieth century and beyond, the cultural framing of old age and its modern institutionalisation within society began to lose some of its former chronological coherence. The 'pre-modern' distinction made between the status of 'the elder' and the state of 'senility' has re-emerged in the 'late modern' distinction between the 'third' and the 'fourth' age. The centuries-old distaste for and fear of old age as 'senility' has been compounded by the growing medicalization of later life, the emergence and expansion of competing narratives associated with the third age, and the progressive 'densification' of the disabilities within the older institutionalised population. The result can be seen as the emergence of a 'late modern' social imaginary deemed as the fourth age. This paper outlines the theoretical evolution of the concept of a social imaginary and demonstrates its relevance to aging studies and its applicability to the fourth age.
这篇论文探讨了“第四年龄”作为一种社会想象的概念。在 20 世纪后半叶及以后,对老年的文化框架及其在社会中的现代制度化开始失去一些以前的时间连贯性。在“现代”之前,“长者”和“衰老”之间的区别,在“后现代”中重新出现,分为“第三”和“第四”年龄。几个世纪以来,人们对衰老的厌恶和恐惧,以及对衰老的恐惧,随着老年生活的日益医学化,与第三年龄相关的竞争叙事的出现和扩大,以及老年制度化人口中残疾的逐渐“密集化”而加剧。其结果可以被视为一种“后现代”社会想象的出现,被认为是第四年龄。本文概述了社会想象概念的理论演变,并展示了其对老龄化研究的相关性及其对第四年龄的适用性。