[根管冲洗剂抗菌活性的比较评估]

[Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial activity of root canal irrigation agents].

作者信息

Dmitrieva N A, Krechina E K, Iarygina L B, Efremov N V

出版信息

Stomatologiia (Mosk). 2013;92(5):9-11.

Abstract

A comparative study of the antimicrobial activity of different antiseptics for root canal irrigation: chlorhexidine bigluconate solution in 6 concentrations (2.0-1.0-0.5-0.2-0.1-0.02%), two sodium hypochlorite formulations: "Parcan" (France) and "Hypochloran-3" (Russia), and stabilized EDTA solution (EDTA Solutions (Korea)) was carried out. The results indicate that the level of antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine is directly proportional to its concentration. Sodium hypochlorite tends to be more effective in compare with chlorhexidine. EDTA Solutions has a pronounced antimicrobial activity against all strains.

摘要

不同根管冲洗防腐剂抗菌活性的比较研究

6种浓度（2.0 - 1.0 - 0.5 - 0.2 - 0.1 - 0.02%）的葡萄糖酸氯己定溶液、两种次氯酸钠制剂：“Parcan”（法国）和“Hypochloran - 3”（俄罗斯）以及稳定的乙二胺四乙酸溶液（乙二胺四乙酸溶液（韩国））。结果表明，氯己定的抗菌活性水平与其浓度成正比。与氯己定相比，次氯酸钠往往更有效。乙二胺四乙酸溶液对所有菌株都有显著的抗菌活性。