Department of Psychology, Clark University, 01610, Worcester, Massachusetts.
J Youth Adolesc. 1986 Jun;15(3):191-204. doi: 10.1007/BF02139122.
Convergent-divergent validity and reliability estimates for clinical interview and self-report measures of ego identity were obtained. Twenty-three males and 25 females completed an extended version of the Ego Identity Interview [H. D. Grotevant, W. Thorebecke, and M. C. Meyer (1982) "An Extension of Marcia's Identity Status Interview into the Interpersonal Domain,"Journal of Youth and Adolescence 11: 33-48] and the extended version of the Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status [H. D. Grotevant and G. R. Adams (1984) "Development of an Objective Measure to Assess Ego-Identity in Adolescence: Validation and Replication,"Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 13: 419-438]. While the two measures were expected to converge, little convergence was observed. The findings suggest that the two measures may be (a) assessing relatively distinct forms of ego identity, or (b) that the ego-identity construct as measured by the process (exploration) and outcome (commitment) dimensions needs further theoretical examination.
获得了临床访谈和自我报告的自我同一性测量的聚合-发散有效性和可靠性估计。23 名男性和 25 名女性完成了扩展版的自我同一性访谈[H. D. Grotevant、W. Thorebecke 和 M. C. Meyer（1982）“将马西亚的身份状态访谈扩展到人际关系领域”，《青年与青少年杂志》11：33-48]和扩展版的客观自我同一性测量[H. D. Grotevant 和 G. R. Adams（1984）“发展客观测量来评估青少年的自我同一性：验证和复制”，《青年与青少年杂志》，13：419-438]。虽然这两个测量方法预计会聚合，但观察到的聚合程度很小。研究结果表明，这两个测量方法可能是(a)评估相对不同形式的自我同一性，或者(b)通过过程（探索）和结果（承诺）维度来衡量的自我同一性结构需要进一步的理论检验。
