Sailor Kevin, Brooks Patricia J
a Department of Psychology , Lehman College, City University of New York , Bronx , NY USA.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(9):1768-85. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.870589. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
Three experiments used the picture-word interference task to evaluate competing models of lexical access in spoken word production. Both the presence of a part-whole relation and association between the target and the interfering word were manipulated. Part terms associated with targets produced facilitation at early stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs; -300 ms in Experiment 1, -300 and -150 ms in Experiment 3), but not at SOA 0 ms. Otherwise, part terms tended to produce interference, with unassociated part terms producing a significant semantic interference effect (SIE) at SOA of 0 ms in Experiment 1, and a similar trend in Experiment 3. Experiment 2 replicated the materials and procedure of Costa, Alario, and Caramazza ( 2005 , Experiment 2. On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(1), 125-131), yet failed to find any semantic facilitation at SOA 0 ms. We propose that these findings are consistent with lexical competition accounts of SIE but difficult to explain in terms of the plausibility of the interfering words as responses to the target.
三项实验使用图片-单词干扰任务来评估口语单词生成中词汇通达的竞争模型。目标词与干扰词之间的部分-整体关系以及关联性均受到操控。与目标词相关的部分词在早期刺激起始异步(SOA;实验1中为-300毫秒,实验3中为-300毫秒和-150毫秒)时产生促进作用,但在SOA为0毫秒时则不然。否则,部分词往往会产生干扰,在实验1中,不相关的部分词在SOA为0毫秒时产生显著的语义干扰效应(SIE),实验3中也有类似趋势。实验2重复了科斯塔、阿拉里奥和卡拉马扎(2005年,实验2。关于图片-单词干扰范式中语义干扰效应的范畴性质。《心理onomic通报与评论》,12(1),125 - 131)的材料和程序,但在SOA为0毫秒时未发现任何语义促进作用。我们认为,这些发现与SIE的词汇竞争解释一致,但难以从干扰词作为对目标词反应的合理性角度进行解释。