• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

词汇选择具有竞争性:图片命名中间接激活的语义联想的证据。

Lexical selection is competitive: evidence from indirectly activated semantic associates during picture naming.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Mar;39(2):348-64. doi: 10.1037/a0028941. Epub 2012 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1037/a0028941
PMID:22732034
Abstract

In this study, we present 3 picture-word interference (PWI) experiments designed to investigate whether lexical selection processes are competitive. We focus on semantic associative relations, which should interfere according to competitive models but not according to certain noncompetitive models. In a modified version of the PWI paradigm, distractor word pairs were simultaneously presented with the target picture. The distractor words were orthographically related directly to the target picture name (distractors: camera bagel; target: camel), indirectly related to the name of a semantic associate of the target (distractors: camera bagel; target: pyramid, an associate of camel), or unrelated. In a first experiment, which included only indirect relations, we failed to find interference from indirectly activated associates. However, in 2 subsequent experiments that included the associates as naming trials within the experiment, we demonstrated that indirect, orthographically mediated activation of associates produces reliable interference effects. The results indicate that semantic interference is not restricted to members of the same category and are problematic for models of lexical selection that do not include lexical competition.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们呈现了 3 个图片-词汇干扰(PWI)实验,旨在探讨词汇选择过程是否具有竞争性。我们关注语义联想关系,根据竞争模型,这些关系应该会产生干扰,但根据某些非竞争模型则不会。在 PWI 范式的一种改良版本中,干扰词对与目标图片同时呈现。干扰词与目标图片名称在拼写上直接相关(干扰词:相机百吉饼;目标:骆驼),与目标的语义联想词在名称上间接相关(干扰词:相机百吉饼;目标:金字塔,骆驼的一个联想词),或者不相关。在仅包含间接关系的第一个实验中,我们未能发现来自间接激活联想词的干扰。然而,在随后的 2 个实验中,这些实验将联想词作为实验内的命名试验,我们证明了间接的、拼写上介导的联想词激活会产生可靠的干扰效应。结果表明,语义干扰不仅限于同一类别成员,而且对不包括词汇竞争的词汇选择模型提出了挑战。

相似文献

1
Lexical selection is competitive: evidence from indirectly activated semantic associates during picture naming.词汇选择具有竞争性:图片命名中间接激活的语义联想的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Mar;39(2):348-64. doi: 10.1037/a0028941. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
2
Feature overlap slows lexical selection: evidence from the picture-word interference paradigm.特征重叠会减缓词汇选择:来自图词干扰范式的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(12):2325-39. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.923922. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
3
Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?延迟命名是否存在语义干扰?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Mar;37(2):522-38. doi: 10.1037/a0021970.
4
Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production.干扰模态可在图片-词汇干扰任务中将语义干扰转化为语义促进:对言语产生中词汇通达理论的启示。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Nov;35(6):1443-53. doi: 10.1037/a0017020.
5
Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.与显性命名中语义和 Stroop 样干扰效应相关的事件相关电位和振荡脑反应。
Brain Res. 2012 Apr 23;1450:87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.050. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
6
My word! Interference from reading object names implies a role for competition during picture name retrieval.天哪!阅读物体名称产生的干扰意味着在图片命名检索过程中存在竞争作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(6):1229-40. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.655699. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
7
Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm.词汇选择并非通过竞争:对图片-单词干扰范式中语义干扰和促进效应的重新诠释。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 May;33(3):503-35. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.503.
8
Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis.延迟命名任务中的语义干扰:反应排除假说的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Jan;34(1):249-56. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.249.
9
Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.图片命名中的语义干扰焦点:来自双重任务表现的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):147-65. doi: 10.1037/a0033745. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
10
The shape of things to come in speech production: Visual form interference during lexical access.言语产生未来的发展趋势:词汇提取过程中的视觉形式干扰
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Sep;71(9):1921-1938. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1367018. Epub 2018 Jan 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Lexical Cohort Size Is Independent of Semantic Context Effects in a Picture-Word Interference Task: A Combined ERP and sLORETA Study.词汇群组大小效应在图-词干扰任务中独立于语义语境效应:一项事件相关电位(ERP)与标准化低分辨率脑电磁断层扫描(sLORETA)相结合的研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Dec 20;13:439. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00439. eCollection 2019.
2
Error-based learning and lexical competition in word production: Evidence from multilingual naming.基于错误的学习和词汇竞争在单词产生中的作用:来自多语言命名的证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 22;14(3):e0213765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213765. eCollection 2019.
3
A close call: Interference from semantic neighbourhood density and similarity in language production.
千钧一发:语言产出中语义邻域密度和相似性的干扰
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jan;47(1):145-168. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0856-y.
4
When and Both Help the Production of : ERP Evidence for Post-lexical Semantic Facilitation in Picture Naming.“and” 与 “when” 均有助于 的产生:图片命名中后词汇语义促进作用的事件相关电位证据
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Apr 10;12:136. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00136. eCollection 2018.
5
Less is more: neural mechanisms underlying anomia treatment in chronic aphasic patients.少即是多:慢性失语症患者命名障碍治疗的神经机制。
Brain. 2017 Nov 1;140(11):3039-3054. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx234.