• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

身份状态访谈组成部分的相对重要性。

The relative importance of identity status interview components.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Youth Adolesc. 1983 Oct;12(5):387-400. doi: 10.1007/BF02088722.

DOI:10.1007/BF02088722
PMID:24306359
Abstract

Eighty college males were given an expanded identity status interview which included two new interpersonal-sexual areas, "attitudes towards sexual expression" and "sex-role beliefs." The relative contribution of the new content areas as well as of the standard three areas (occupation, religion, and politics) to overall identity status was assessed by noting the extent of correspondence. Identity status in each content area was also compared with performance on the dependent variable of cognitive complexity. Ideology contributed more than occupation both to overall status rating, as well as to discrimination on the dependent variable. Results on the two new areas supported the view that interpersonal-sexual concerns are important for men's identity development as well as for women's. The finding that all interview areas corresponded well with overall identity status and discriminated significantly on the dependent measure leads to the suggestion that the process variables of crisis and commitment may so overshadow a particular content area that any content of personal relevance for the late adolescent might be used in investigating ego identity development.

摘要

80 名男性大学生接受了扩展的身份认同访谈,其中包括两个新的人际-性领域:“对性表达的态度”和“性别角色信念”。通过注意一致性的程度,评估了新内容领域以及标准的三个领域(职业、宗教和政治)对整体身份认同的相对贡献。每个内容领域的身份认同也与认知复杂性的因变量表现进行了比较。意识形态对整体地位评价的贡献大于职业,对因变量的区分也是如此。关于这两个新领域的结果支持了这样一种观点,即人际-性问题对男性的身份发展以及对女性的身份发展都很重要。所有访谈领域与整体身份认同都很好地对应,并在因变量上显著区分的发现,使得危机和承诺的过程变量可能会使特定的内容领域黯然失色,以至于青少年后期任何与个人相关的内容都可能被用于调查自我认同的发展。

相似文献

1
The relative importance of identity status interview components.身份状态访谈组成部分的相对重要性。
J Youth Adolesc. 1983 Oct;12(5):387-400. doi: 10.1007/BF02088722.
2
Sex differences in the resolution of the identity crisis.性别差异在解决身份危机中的作用。
J Youth Adolesc. 1977 Dec;6(4):337-42. doi: 10.1007/BF02139237.
3
The relative importance of identity status interview components: replication and extension.身份状态访谈组成部分的相对重要性:重复与扩展
J Adolesc. 1986 Dec;9(4):337-54. doi: 10.1016/s0140-1971(86)80040-9.
4
The importance of ethnicity in the development of identity of black adolescents.种族因素在黑人青少年身份认同发展中的重要性。
Psychol Rep. 1989 Aug;65(1):75-82. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1989.65.1.75.
5
Exploration and commitment: Sex differences and methodological problems in the use of identity status categories.探索与承诺:身份认同状态类别使用中的性别差异和方法学问题。
J Youth Adolesc. 1977 Dec;6(4):353-74. doi: 10.1007/BF02139239.
6
Identity status in high school females.高中女生的身份认同状况。
Adolescence. 1978 Winter;13(52):627-41.
7
Gender differences in identity development: issues of process, domain and timing.身份发展中的性别差异:过程、领域和时间问题。
J Adolesc. 1989 Jun;12(2):117-38. doi: 10.1016/0140-1971(89)90003-1.
8
Domain-specific gender comparisons in identity development among college youth: ideology and relationships.大学青年身份发展中特定领域的性别比较:意识形态与人际关系
Adolescence. 1997 Fall;32(127):559-77.
9
Global versus domain-specific statuses in identity research: a comparison of two self-report measures.身份认同研究中的全球与特定领域状态:两种自我报告测量方法的比较
J Adolesc. 2001 Dec;24(6):681-99. doi: 10.1006/jado.2001.0438.
10
The impact of the identity crisis on the adjustment of late adolescent males.身份危机对青少年后期男性调整的影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 1974 Sep;3(3):207-16. doi: 10.1007/BF02214750.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship among ego identity status, field-independence, and traditional femininity.自我同一性状态、领域独立性与传统女性气质之间的关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 1975 Mar;4(1):73-82. doi: 10.1007/BF01537802.
2
Ego identity status and decision styles.自我同一性状态与决策风格。
J Youth Adolesc. 1974 Mar;3(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02215332.
3
The state of research on ego identity: A review and appraisal : Part II.自我同一性研究的现状:回顾与评价:第二部分。
J Youth Adolesc. 1978 Dec;7(4):371-92. doi: 10.1007/BF01537806.
4
The state of research on ego identity: A review and appraisal : Part I.自我同一性研究现状述评与评价:第一部分
J Youth Adolesc. 1978 Sep;7(3):223-51. doi: 10.1007/BF01537976.
5
Identity formation, nAchievement, and fear of success in college men and women.大学生男女的身份形成、成就和对成功的恐惧。
J Youth Adolesc. 1978 Mar;7(1):49-62. doi: 10.1007/BF01538686.
6
Ego identity status: relationship to change in self-esteem, "general maladjustment," and authoritarianism.自我认同状态:与自尊变化、“一般适应不良”及专制主义的关系。
J Pers. 1967 Mar;35(1):118-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01419.x.
7
Development and validation of ego-identity status.自我认同状态的发展与验证
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1966 May;3(5):551-8. doi: 10.1037/h0023281.
8
Ego identity status, adjustment, and academic achievement.自我认同状态、适应与学业成就。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1970 Apr;34(2):288. doi: 10.1037/h0029044.
9
Ego identity status in college women.大学女生的自我认同状态
J Pers. 1970 Jun;38(2):249-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1970.tb00007.x.
10
Attitudes toward premarital intercourse in determining ego identity status in college women.在确定大学女生自我认同状态时对婚前性行为的态度。
J Pers. 1972 Sep;40(3):472-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00074.x.