Kroger J
J Adolesc. 1986 Dec;9(4):337-54. doi: 10.1016/s0140-1971(86)80040-9.
The present study partially replicates and extends the work of Rogow et al. (1983) in probing the relative importance of Ego Identity Status Interview components for both sexes. Eighty female and sixty male students attending a New Zealand university were given the Ego Identity Status Interview with identity components of occupation, religion, politics, and sex role beliefs presented in counterbalanced order. Subjects were then asked to rank components in order of importance to their sense of identity and additional identity contents were explored through open-ended questions. This investigation revealed few sex differences in terms of number of content areas having a common rating, hit rates between single or paired content areas and overall identity ratings, rank order for importance of identity contents, or reported areas of additional identity concerns. In support of Rogow findings, this study suggests that identity not be viewed as a unitary structure and encourages the reporting of both component and overall identity status ratings to allow a more comprehensive means of researching the identity formation process. In general, the identity status approach provides a useful model for clinical research of ego synthesis in late adolescence.
本研究部分重复并扩展了罗戈等人（1983年）的工作，探究了自我认同状态访谈各组成部分对男女两性的相对重要性。选取了新西兰一所大学的80名女学生和60名男学生，让他们接受自我认同状态访谈，访谈中职业、宗教、政治和性别角色信念等认同组成部分以平衡顺序呈现。然后要求受试者按照对其身份认同的重要性对各组成部分进行排序，并通过开放式问题探索其他身份内容。这项调查显示，在具有共同评分的内容领域数量、单个或配对内容领域与总体身份评分之间的命中率、身份内容重要性的排名顺序或报告的其他身份关注领域方面，几乎没有性别差异。为支持罗戈的研究结果，本研究表明不应将身份视为一个单一结构，并鼓励报告各组成部分以及总体身份状态评分，以便采用更全面的方法研究身份形成过程。总体而言，身份状态方法为青春期后期自我整合的临床研究提供了一个有用的模型。
