Institut für Biologie, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, D-7400, Tübingen, Federal Republic of Germany.
J Chem Ecol. 1985 Apr;11(4):507-23. doi: 10.1007/BF00989562.
The change of state in the central nervous system ofGymnocorymbus ternetzi after detection of hypoxanthine-l(N)-oxide, hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide, and of the alarm substance from conspecifics was measured quantitatively by means of the fishes' equilibrium behavior. The fish swam freely in a tiny cage, illuminated horizontally from one side. The change of the angle of inclination of the dorsoventral axis of the fish was registered by means of a videorecorder. The recordings were later measured on the monitor in single frames at 0.2-sec intervals where the equilibrium position of the fish could be accurately determined ± 1 °. Various substances were presented to the fish, and their effects upon equilibrium position were recorded. An enhanced optical alertness shown by an increase in the fishes' inclination was generally produced with alarm substance. Without any additional stimulation, the factorU, representing quantitatively the degree of the change of central state, varied slightly within the experimental period of 1 min; however, this factor never exceededU= 1.0 ± 0.15 in control fish. The increase ofU usually exceeded considerably the value 1.15 when skin extract from conspecifics or 7-8 μg of hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide were given. However, when hypoxanthine-l (N)-oxide was presented,U generally did not exceed 1.15. The difference between hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide and hypoxanthine-l(N)-oxide was highly significant. This result is in accordance with the findings on fish schools ofDanio malabaricus, where hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide elicited the fright reaction, but hypoxanthine-1(N)-oxide was ineffective. The results support the hypothesis that the alarm substance from the skin ofPhoxinus phoxinus is identical with hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide. The results with alarm substance or hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide did not show any adaptation. This was also true in fish that were stimulated repeatedly at intervals of a couple of minutes only. InGymnocorymbus, which has compensated for removal of the otolith of one utriculus, conspecific skin extract triggers the typical postoperative phenomenon, i.e., rotation around the fishes' long axis towards the operated side. Whereas such a decompensation could be elicited by hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide as well, hypoxanthine-l(N)-oxide had no effect. This finding is interpreted as an effect of the alarm substance and of hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide on the centers of equilibrium.
采用鱼类平衡行为的方法,定量测量了 Gymnocorymbus ternetzi 中枢神经系统在检测到次黄嘌呤-l(N)-氧化物、次黄嘌呤-3(N)-氧化物和同种鱼类报警物质后的状态变化。鱼在一个小笼子里自由游动,笼子从一侧水平照明。通过录像机记录鱼背腹轴倾斜角度的变化。然后在监视器上以 0.2 秒的间隔逐帧测量记录,在监视器上可以准确地确定鱼的平衡位置±1°。向鱼展示各种物质,并记录它们对平衡位置的影响。通常,报警物质会使鱼的警觉性明显增强,表现为鱼倾斜度增加。在没有任何额外刺激的情况下,代表中枢状态变化程度的定量因素 U 在 1 分钟的实验期间内略有变化;然而,在对照鱼中,该因素从未超过 U=1.0±0.15。当给予同种鱼类的皮肤提取物或 7-8μg 的次黄嘌呤-3(N)-氧化物时,U 的增加通常会大大超过 1.15。然而,当给予次黄嘌呤-l(N)-氧化物时,U 通常不会超过 1.15。次黄嘌呤-3(N)-氧化物和次黄嘌呤-l(N)-氧化物之间存在显著差异。这一结果与 Danio malabaricus 鱼类群体的发现一致,其中次黄嘌呤-3(N)-氧化物引发了惊恐反应,但次黄嘌呤-l(N)-氧化物无效。这些结果支持了这样一种假设,即来自 Phoxinus phoxinus 皮肤的报警物质与次黄嘌呤-3(N)-氧化物相同。报警物质或次黄嘌呤-3(N)-氧化物的结果没有显示出任何适应现象。在仅每隔几分钟就受到刺激的鱼类中也是如此。在已经补偿了一个耳石囊的 Gymnocorymbus 中,同种鱼类的皮肤提取物会引发典型的术后现象,即绕鱼的长轴向手术侧旋转。虽然次黄嘌呤-3(N)-氧化物也能引起这种失代偿,但次黄嘌呤-l(N)-氧化物没有效果。这一发现被解释为报警物质和次黄嘌呤-3(N)-氧化物对平衡中心的影响。