Division of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 56, 00014, Helsinki, Finland,
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Apr;36(2):345-51. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9899-0. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
In an automated dose dispensing (ADD) service, medicines are packed in unit-dose bags according to administration times. When the service is initiated, the patient's medication list is reconciled and the medication is reviewed on the basis of this list.
The aim of this national study was to investigate how the medication list was reconciled, what type of medication review was conducted, and what changes were made to the patient's medications when the ADD service is initiated.
Primary care in Finland.
All patients enrolled in the service during a 3-week period in autumn 2010 were included in the study. All community pharmacies (n = 267) purchasing unit-dose bags from Espoonlahti Pharmacy documented the actions taken in the ADD initiation process using a structured data collection sheet.
Information sources needed in medication reconciliation, the type of medication review conducted and changes made to patients' medications.
Documentation was completed for 147 out of 325 new ADD users resulting 45 % as a response rate. More than one source was needed for 63 % of the patients in medication reconciliation. The most common sources used were nursing staff (72 % of the patients) and an existing medication list (71 %). Some type of medication review, most commonly a prescription review, was conducted for the majority of the patients (96 %), usually in multi-professional collaboration. Treatment-related changes were made for 43 % of the patients and technical changes were made for 93 % of the patients.
The medication list was incomplete for more than half of the patients. Some type of medication review was conducted for most of the patients. Both treatment-related changes and technical changes were made on patients' medications during the initiation process. The start-up process of the ADD service needs further development to ensure a standard procedure and optimum use of resources.
在自动化剂量配药(ADD)服务中,药物根据给药时间装入单位剂量袋中。当服务启动时,根据药物清单对患者的药物进行核对和审查。
本项全国性研究旨在调查在启动 ADD 服务时,药物清单是如何核对的,进行了哪种类型的药物审查,以及对患者的药物进行了哪些更改。
芬兰的初级保健。
在 2010 年秋季的 3 周内,所有加入该服务的患者都被纳入研究。所有从埃斯波拉赫蒂药店(Espoonlahti Pharmacy)购买单位剂量袋的社区药店(n = 267)都使用结构化数据收集表记录了在 ADD 启动过程中采取的措施。
药物核对所需的信息来源、进行的药物审查类型以及对患者药物的更改。
完成了 325 名新 ADD 用户中的 147 名的记录,应答率为 45%。在药物核对中,63%的患者需要不止一个信息来源。最常用的信息来源是护理人员(72%的患者)和现有的药物清单(71%)。对于大多数患者(96%),通常在多专业合作中,进行了某种类型的药物审查,最常见的是处方审查。对 43%的患者进行了治疗相关的更改,对 93%的患者进行了技术更改。
超过一半的患者的药物清单不完整。对大多数患者进行了某种类型的药物审查。在启动过程中,对患者的药物进行了治疗相关的更改和技术更改。ADD 服务的启动过程需要进一步发展,以确保标准程序和资源的最佳利用。