Heaton Alexandra E, Meldrum Suzanne J, Foster Jonathan K, Prescott Susan L, Simmer Karen
School of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia Perth, WA, Australia.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 20;7:774. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00774.
The proposal that dietary docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) enhances neurocognitive functioning in term infants is controversial. Theoretical evidence, laboratory research and human epidemiological studies have convincingly demonstrated that DHA deficiency can negatively impact neurocognitive development. However, the results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DHA supplementation in human term-born infants have been inconsistent. This article will (i) discuss the role of DHA in the human diet, (ii) explore the physiological mechanisms by which DHA plausibly influences neurocognitive capacity, and (iii) seek to characterize the optimal intake of DHA during infancy for neurocognitive functioning, based on existing research that has been undertaken in developed countries (specifically, within Australia). The major observational studies and RCTs that have examined dietary DHA in human infants and animals are presented, and we consider suggestions that DHA requirements vary across individuals according to genetic profile. It is important that the current evidence concerning DHA supplementation is carefully evaluated so that appropriate recommendations can be made and future directions of research can be strategically planned.
关于膳食二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)可增强足月儿神经认知功能的提议存在争议。理论证据、实验室研究和人类流行病学研究均已令人信服地表明,DHA缺乏会对神经认知发育产生负面影响。然而,对足月儿补充DHA的随机对照试验(RCT)结果并不一致。本文将(i)讨论DHA在人类饮食中的作用,(ii)探讨DHA可能影响神经认知能力的生理机制,以及(iii)基于在发达国家(特别是澳大利亚)开展的现有研究,试图确定婴儿期神经认知功能所需DHA的最佳摄入量。文中介绍了在人类婴儿和动物中研究膳食DHA的主要观察性研究和随机对照试验,并且我们考虑了关于DHA需求量因个体基因组成不同而存在差异的建议。仔细评估目前有关补充DHA的证据很重要,这样才能给出适当的建议并从战略上规划未来的研究方向。