Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 28;8(11):e82320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082320. eCollection 2013.
The current report presents a temporal learning account as a potential alternative to the conflict adaptation account of list-level proportion congruent effects in the Stroop paradigm. Specifically, retrieval of information about response times on previous trials influences a participant's preparedness to respond at a similar time on following trials. First, an adaptation of the Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model is presented, and a list-level effect is produced with a temporal learning mechanism. Next, linear mixed effect model analyses show that temporal learning biases are present in list-level proportion congruent data. A non-conflict experiment is then presented in which a list-level effect is observed with a contrast, rather than congruency, manipulation. Analyses of the experimental and simulated data could not, however, provide a clear picture of whether temporal learning was the sole contributor to the list-level proportion congruent effect. These results do, however, demonstrate that caution is warranted when interpreting list-level proportion congruent effects.
目前的报告提出了一种时间学习解释,作为斯特鲁普范式中列表级比例一致效应的冲突适应解释的潜在替代方案。具体来说,检索关于先前试验的反应时间的信息会影响参与者在随后试验中以相似时间做出反应的准备程度。首先,提出了并行情节处理(PEP)模型的一种改编,并使用时间学习机制产生了列表级效应。接下来,线性混合效应模型分析表明,时间学习偏差存在于列表级比例一致数据中。然后呈现了一个非冲突实验,其中使用对比而不是一致性操纵观察到列表级效应。然而,对实验和模拟数据的分析并不能清楚地说明时间学习是否是列表级比例一致效应的唯一贡献者。然而,这些结果确实表明,在解释列表级比例一致效应时需要谨慎。