Pfeuffer Christina U
University of Freiburg, Department of Psychology, Freiburg, DE.
J Cogn. 2020 Sep 10;3(1):24. doi: 10.5334/joc.110.
Schmidt et al.'s (2020) PEP model accurately reflects the complexity of task switching based on bottom-up assumptions and episodic memory, re-evaluating the contribution of commonly presumed top-down processes. Extending it to long-term bindings and their item-specific effects could eludicate puzzling findings regarding the independence of long-term bindings between stimuli, responses, and task-specific categorizations as well as the relation between short-term and long-term bindings. Moreover, ideomotor theories of action control provide a bottom-up basis of incorporating volition and intentional action into the PEP model which is currently restricted to stimulus-based action.
施密特等人（2020年）的PEP模型基于自下而上的假设和情景记忆准确反映了任务切换的复杂性，重新评估了通常假定的自上而下过程的贡献。将其扩展到长期绑定及其特定项目效应，可以阐明关于刺激、反应和特定任务分类之间长期绑定的独立性以及短期和长期绑定之间关系的令人困惑的发现。此外，动作控制的观念运动理论为将意志和有意动作纳入目前仅限于基于刺激的动作的PEP模型提供了自下而上的基础。
