Chapleau Kristine M, Oswald Debra L
a Department of Psychology , Marquette University , Milwaukee , Wisconsin , USA.
J Trauma Dissociation. 2014;15(2):204-18. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2014.867573.
Rape is a pervasive social problem that causes serious physical and psychological repercussions. Rape victims' recovery is often complicated by the public's failure to believe the victim and restore justice. This study applied system justification theory to examine whether the justification of gender inequality is related to moral outrage (an emotional precursor to corrective action) and rape myth acceptance; we also examined whether rape myth acceptance is associated with moral outrage at injustice. Results showed that gender-specific system justification correlated with less moral outrage at human suffering as well as greater rape myth acceptance. The relationships between these variables were similar for men and for women, a finding that suggests that rape myths are system justifying for women. When we controlled for gender-specific system justification, rape myth acceptance correlated with less moral outrage. Results are discussed in the context of how legitimizing ideologies reduce moral outrage at injustice and perpetuate a system of sexual violence.
强奸是一个普遍存在的社会问题,会造成严重的身心影响。强奸受害者的康复往往因公众不相信受害者以及未能伸张正义而变得复杂。本研究应用系统正当性理论来检验性别不平等的正当性是否与道德义愤(采取纠正行动的情感先兆)以及对强奸谬见的认同有关;我们还研究了对强奸谬见的认同是否与对不公正的道德义愤相关。结果表明,特定性别的系统正当性与对人类苦难的道德义愤减少以及对强奸谬见的更高认同相关。这些变量之间的关系在男性和女性中相似,这一发现表明强奸谬见对女性起到了系统正当化的作用。当我们控制了特定性别的系统正当性后,对强奸谬见的认同与较少的道德义愤相关。研究结果将在合法化意识形态如何减少对不公正的道德义愤并使性暴力系统长期存在的背景下进行讨论。