Liu Weiwei, Liu Junxia, Zhang Xiaodong, Han Wei, Xiong Shun, Huang Guoning
Chongqing Reproductive and Genetics Institute, Chongqing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital , Yuzhong District, Chongqing , P. R. China.
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2014 Mar;17(1):50-5. doi: 10.3109/14647273.2013.859746. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
Failed fertilization after conventional IVF is one of the most frustrating experiences in assisted reproductive technology. "Late" rescue ICSI may be not an optimal strategy for treating unfertilized oocytes. Short co-incubation of gametes combined with early rescue ICSI has some advantages for complete fertilization failure after IVF. We evaluate the strategy and the optimal time for early rescue ICSI. A total of 180 patients underwent short co-incubation of gametes combined with early rescue ICSI treatment for complete fertilization failure after IVF (study group). A total of 494 ICSI patients with male factor infertility served as a control group. Clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and live birth rate in the two groups were compared. The study group was divided into three different rescue time intervals (<6 h, 6-8 h, and >8 h). Clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate, and live birth rate were comparable between the study group and the control group. There was a negative correlation between clinical outcomes and rescue time interval.
常规体外受精(IVF)后受精失败是辅助生殖技术中最令人沮丧的经历之一。“晚期”补救性卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)可能不是治疗未受精卵母细胞的最佳策略。配子短时间共孵育联合早期补救性ICSI对IVF后完全受精失败有一些优势。我们评估了早期补救性ICSI的策略和最佳时间。共有180例患者因IVF后完全受精失败接受了配子短时间共孵育联合早期补救性ICSI治疗(研究组)。共有494例男性因素不育的ICSI患者作为对照组。比较了两组的临床妊娠率、着床率和活产率。研究组分为三个不同的补救时间间隔(<6小时、6 - 8小时和>8小时)。研究组和对照组之间的临床妊娠率、着床率和活产率相当。临床结局与补救时间间隔呈负相关。