McMahon Sarah, Allen Christopher T, Postmus Judy L, McMahon Sheila M, Peterson N Andrew, Lowe Hoffman Melanie
a Center on Violence Against Women and Children, School of Social Work , Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey , New Brunswick , New Jersey.
J Am Coll Health. 2014;62(1):58-66. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2013.849258.
The purpose of this study is to further investigate the factor structure and strength of the Bystander Attitude Scale-Revised and Bystander Behavior Scale-Revised (BAS-R and BBS-R).
First-year students (N = 4,054) at a large public university in the Northeast completed a survey in 2010 as part of a larger longitudinal study of a sexual violence bystander education intervention program on campus.
Exploratory structural equation modeling was used to analyze survey responses to the BAS-R and BBS-R.
For BAS-R, the best fit was a 4-factor model: (1) high-risk situations, (2) postassault support for victims, (3) postassault reporting of perpetrators, and (4) proactive opportunities. BBS-R was a 2-factor model: (1) intervention opportunities before, during, or after an assault, and (2) proactive opportunities.
The BAS-R and BBS-R provide reliable tools that can be utilized to evaluate sexual violence bystander programs.
本研究旨在进一步探究修订后的旁观者态度量表（BAS-R）和修订后的旁观者行为量表（BBS-R）的因子结构及强度。
2010年，东北部一所大型公立大学的一年级学生（N = 4,054）完成了一项调查，该调查是校园性暴力旁观者教育干预项目一项更大规模纵向研究的一部分。
采用探索性结构方程模型分析对BAS-R和BBS-R的调查回复。
对于BAS-R，最佳拟合是一个四因子模型：（1）高风险情境，（2）袭击后对受害者的支持，（3）袭击后对犯罪者的举报，以及（4）主动干预机会。BBS-R是一个两因子模型：（1）袭击前、袭击期间或袭击后的干预机会，以及（2）主动干预机会。
BAS-R和BBS-R提供了可靠的工具，可用于评估性暴力旁观者项目。
