Suppr超能文献

开发烧伤严重程度评分(BISS):将年龄和烧伤总面积纳入损伤严重程度评分(ISS)可提高死亡率一致性。

Developing a burn injury severity score (BISS): adding age and total body surface area burned to the injury severity score (ISS) improves mortality concordance.

作者信息

Cassidy J Tristan, Phillips Michael, Fatovich Daniel, Duke Janine, Edgar Dale, Wood Fiona

机构信息

Royal Perth Hospital, Australia.

Western Australian Institute for Medical Research, University of Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Burns. 2014 Aug;40(5):805-13. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Dec 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is limited research validating the injury severity score (ISS) in burns. We examined the concordance of ISS with burn mortality. We hypothesized that combining age and total body surface area (TBSA) burned to the ISS gives a more accurate mortality risk estimate.

METHODS

Data from the Royal Perth Hospital Trauma Registry and the Royal Perth Hospital Burns Minimum Data Set were linked. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) measured concordance of ISS with mortality. Using logistic regression models with death as the dependent variable we developed a burn-specific injury severity score (BISS).

RESULTS

There were 1344 burns with 24 (1.8%) deaths, median TBSA 5% (IQR 2-10), and median age 36 years (IQR 23-50). The results show ISS is a good predictor of death for burns when ISS≤15 (OR 1.29, p=0.02), but not for ISS>15 (ISS 16-24: OR 1.09, p=0.81; ISS 25-49: OR 0.81, p=0.19). Comparing the AUCs adjusted for age, gender and cause, ISS of 84% (95% CI 82-85%) and BISS of 95% (95% CI 92-98%), demonstrated superior performance of BISS as a mortality predictor for burns.

CONCLUSION

ISS is a poor predictor of death in severe burns. The BISS combines ISS with age and TBSA and performs significantly better than the ISS.

摘要

背景

验证烧伤损伤严重程度评分(ISS)的研究有限。我们研究了ISS与烧伤死亡率的一致性。我们假设将年龄和烧伤总面积(TBSA)纳入ISS可提供更准确的死亡风险估计。

方法

将皇家珀斯医院创伤登记处和皇家珀斯医院烧伤最小数据集的数据进行关联。通过受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)来衡量ISS与死亡率的一致性。以死亡为因变量,使用逻辑回归模型开发了烧伤特异性损伤严重程度评分(BISS)。

结果

共有1344例烧伤患者,其中24例(1.8%)死亡,TBSA中位数为5%(四分位间距2 - 10),年龄中位数为36岁(四分位间距23 - 50)。结果显示,当ISS≤15时,ISS是烧伤死亡的良好预测指标(OR = 1.29,p = 0.02),但对于ISS>15时并非如此(ISS 16 - 24:OR = 1.09,p = 0.81;ISS 25 - 49:OR = 0.81,p = 0.19)。在对年龄、性别和病因进行调整后比较AUC,ISS为84%(95%CI 82 - 85%),BISS为95%(95%CI 92 - 98%),表明BISS作为烧伤死亡率预测指标的性能优于ISS。

结论

ISS在严重烧伤中对死亡的预测能力较差。BISS将ISS与年龄和TBSA相结合,其表现明显优于ISS。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验