North Dakota State University, United States.
Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, United States.
Addict Behav. 2014 Mar;39(3):709-12. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
It is important to understand the individual differences that contribute to greater frequency or intensity of marijuana use, or greater frequency of experiencing marijuana-related problems. The current study examined several elements of behavioral and emotional self-regulation as predictors of the likelihood and intensity of both marijuana use and marijuana-related problems. As predicted, indices of behavioral self-regulation (self-control, sensation seeking) were better predictors of marijuana use, while indices of emotional self-regulation (affect, distress tolerance, and emotional instability) better predicted marijuana-related problems. Surprisingly, urgency was not related to use but was predictive of problems, and there were no significant interactions between behavioral and emotional self-regulation in predicting either use or problems. From these findings we conclude that while behavioral dysregulation may put individuals at risk for using marijuana, or using it more frequently, it is those individuals with difficulty in emotional self-regulation that are at risk for experiencing negative consequences as a result of their marijuana use. Clinically, these data are relevant; clinicians might focus more on addressing emotional regulation in order to lessen or eliminate the consequences of marijuana use.
了解导致大麻使用频率或强度增加或大麻相关问题发生频率增加的个体差异很重要。本研究考察了行为和情绪自我调节的几个方面,作为预测大麻使用和大麻相关问题可能性和强度的指标。正如预测的那样,行为自我调节的指标(自我控制、感觉寻求)是大麻使用的更好预测指标,而情绪自我调节的指标(情感、痛苦耐受力和情绪不稳定性)则更好地预测了大麻相关问题。令人惊讶的是,紧迫性与使用无关,但可预测问题,而且在预测使用或问题方面,行为和情绪自我调节之间没有显著的相互作用。从这些发现中,我们得出结论,虽然行为失调可能使个人面临使用大麻或更频繁地使用大麻的风险,但那些在情绪自我调节方面有困难的人更有可能因使用大麻而产生负面后果。在临床上,这些数据是相关的;临床医生可能会更加关注解决情绪调节问题,以减轻或消除大麻使用的后果。