Suppr超能文献

体外循环备用可避免激光辅助导线拔除术中血管撕裂导致的死亡。

Cardiopulmonary bypass standby avoids fatality due to vascular laceration in laser-assisted lead extraction.

作者信息

Wang Wei, Wang Xiaowei, Modry Dennis, Wang Shaohua

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Card Surg. 2014 Mar;29(2):274-8. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12294. Epub 2014 Jan 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Vascular laceration is a rare but potentially fatal complication with excimer laser-assisted pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead extraction. We report our experience on management of vascular laceration during laser-assisted lead extraction.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 140 consecutive patients undergoing laser-assisted lead extraction from May 2004 to March 2011. Clinical outcomes were compared in patients with and without intraoperative vascular laceration. Risk factors were identified by multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

All cases were performed in the operating room with cardiopulmonary bypass standby. Complete lead removal was achieved in 118 (84.3%) patients. Potentially fatal complications occurred in five patients (3.6%) who had superior vena cava and/or innominate vein laceration. Lacerated veins were repaired under emergency sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass. The mean time from vascular laceration to establishment of cardiopulmonary bypass was 6.0 ± 3.6 minutes. All five patients survived without neurological sequelae. The rates of dual-coil leads (80.0% vs. 31.9%, p=0.025) and history of lead revision (100.0% vs. 40.0%, p=0.008) were significantly higher in the five patients who had major vascular laceration than those who did not. Logistic regression showed that dual-coil implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead was an independent risk factor for vascular laceration (odds ratio 11.264, p=0.048).

CONCLUSION

Cardiopulmonary bypass standby is helpful when performing laser-assisted lead extraction to treat potentially fatal vascular laceration. Dual-coil lead is an independent risk factor to predict intraoperative vascular laceration.

摘要

目的

血管撕裂是准分子激光辅助起搏器或植入式心脏复律除颤器导线拔除术中一种罕见但可能致命的并发症。我们报告我们在激光辅助导线拔除术中处理血管撕裂的经验。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2004年5月至2011年3月期间连续接受激光辅助导线拔除术的140例患者。比较有和无术中血管撕裂患者的临床结局。通过多因素逻辑回归确定危险因素。

结果

所有病例均在手术室进行,体外循环备用。118例(84.3%)患者成功完全拔除导线。5例(3.6%)患者发生了可能致命的并发症,这些患者出现了上腔静脉和/或无名静脉撕裂。在紧急开胸和体外循环下修复撕裂的静脉。从血管撕裂到建立体外循环的平均时间为6.0±3.6分钟。所有5例患者均存活,无神经后遗症。发生严重血管撕裂的5例患者中双线圈导线的比例(80.0%对31.9%,p=0.025)和导线翻修史的比例(100.0%对40.0%,p=0.008)显著高于未发生严重血管撕裂的患者。逻辑回归显示双线圈植入式心脏复律除颤器导线是血管撕裂的独立危险因素(比值比11.264,p=0.048)。

结论

在进行激光辅助导线拔除术以治疗可能致命的血管撕裂时,体外循环备用是有帮助的。双线圈导线是预测术中血管撕裂的独立危险因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验