• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

fMRI 研究证据表明阅读汉语复合词时存在字形和语音的相互作用。

fMRI evidence for the interaction between orthography and phonology in reading Chinese compound words.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Peking University Beijing, China ; Center for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 21;7:753. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00753. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00753
PMID:24319418
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3836272/
Abstract

Compound words make up a major part of modern Chinese vocabulary. Behavioral studies have demonstrated that access to lexical semantics of compound words is driven by the interaction between orthographic and phonological information. However, little is known about the neural underpinnings of compound word processing. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging study, we asked participants to perform lexical decisions to pseudohomophones, which were constructed by replacing one or both constituents of two-character compound words with orthographically dissimilar homophonic characters. Mixed pseudohomophones, which shared the first constituent with the base words, were more difficult to reject than non-pseudohomophone non-words. This effect was accompanied by the increased activation of bilateral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), left inferior parietal lobule (IPL), and left angular gyrus. The pure pseudohomophones, which shared no constituent with their base words, were rejected as quickly as non-word controls and did not elicit any significant neural activation. The effective connectivity of a phonological pathway from left IPL to left IFG was enhanced for the mixed pseudohomophones but not for pure pseudohomophones. These findings demonstrated that phonological activation alone, as in the case of the pure pseudohomophones, is not sufficient to drive access to lexical representations of compound words, and that orthographic information interacts with phonology, playing a gating role in the recognition of Chinese compound words.

摘要

复合词构成了现代汉语词汇的主要部分。行为研究表明,复合词词汇语义的获取是由字形和语音信息的相互作用驱动的。然而,对于复合词处理的神经基础知之甚少。在这项功能磁共振成像研究中,我们要求参与者对假同音字进行词汇判断,这些假同音字是通过用字形上相似的同音字符替换两个字符复合词的一个或两个组成部分来构建的。与基词共享第一个组成部分的混合假同音字比非假同音字非词更难被拒绝。这种效应伴随着双侧额下回(IFG)、左顶下小叶(IPL)和左角回的激活增加。与基词没有共同组成部分的纯假同音字与非词控制一样被快速拒绝,没有引起任何显著的神经激活。来自左 IPL 到左 IFG 的语音通路的有效连接对于混合假同音字增强,但对于纯假同音字则没有。这些发现表明,单纯的语音激活(如纯假同音字的情况)不足以驱动对复合词词汇表示的访问,并且字形信息与语音相互作用,在识别汉语复合词时起着门控作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b4f/3836272/e17c9a5aeac4/fnhum-07-00753-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b4f/3836272/17f383525e71/fnhum-07-00753-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b4f/3836272/0fb1f75181ca/fnhum-07-00753-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b4f/3836272/ad8feb855a71/fnhum-07-00753-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b4f/3836272/e17c9a5aeac4/fnhum-07-00753-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b4f/3836272/17f383525e71/fnhum-07-00753-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b4f/3836272/0fb1f75181ca/fnhum-07-00753-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b4f/3836272/ad8feb855a71/fnhum-07-00753-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b4f/3836272/e17c9a5aeac4/fnhum-07-00753-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
fMRI evidence for the interaction between orthography and phonology in reading Chinese compound words.fMRI 研究证据表明阅读汉语复合词时存在字形和语音的相互作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 21;7:753. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00753. eCollection 2013.
2
Modulation of brain regions involved in word recognition by homophonous stimuli: an fMRI study.同音字刺激对参与单词识别的脑区的调制:一项 fMRI 研究。
Brain Res. 2011 Jan 7;1367:250-64. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.089. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
3
The neural bases of the pseudohomophone effect: Phonological constraints on lexico-semantic access in reading.假同音词效应的神经基础:阅读中词汇语义通达的语音限制
Neuroscience. 2015 Jun 4;295:151-63. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.03.035. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
4
Effective brain connectivity in children with reading difficulties during phonological processing.语音处理过程中阅读困难儿童的有效脑连接性
Brain Lang. 2008 Nov;107(2):91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2007.12.009. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
5
The Neural Correlates of the Interaction between Semantic and Phonological Processing for Chinese Character Reading.汉字阅读中语义与语音加工交互作用的神经关联
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 23;7:947. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00947. eCollection 2016.
6
Correspondence between cognitive and neural representations for phonology, orthography, and semantics in supramarginal compared to angular gyrus.与角回相比,缘上回中语音、正字法和语义的认知与神经表征之间的对应关系。
Brain Struct Funct. 2023 Jan;228(1):255-271. doi: 10.1007/s00429-022-02590-y. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
7
ERP correlates of the development of orthographical and phonological processing during Chinese sentence reading.汉语句子阅读过程中正字法和语音加工发展的事件相关电位关联
Brain Res. 2008 Jul 11;1219:91-102. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.04.052. Epub 2008 Apr 27.
8
Semantic and phonological influences on the processing of words and pseudohomophones.语义和语音对单词及假同音字加工的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2003 Sep;31(6):856-66. doi: 10.3758/bf03196440.
9
Looks aren't everything: pseudohomophones prime words but nonwords do not.外表并非一切:假同音异形词能启动单词,但非词则不能。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2007 Jan;36(1):47-63. doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9032-9.
10
Functional connectivity during orthographic, phonological, and semantic processing of Chinese characters identifies distinct visuospatial and phonosemantic networks.中文的正字法、语音和语义处理过程中的功能连接可识别出独特的视空间和音义网络。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Nov;43(16):5066-5080. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26075. Epub 2022 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The sequence effect: Character position processing in Chinese words.序列效应:中文词汇中的字符位置处理
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 5;13:877627. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877627. eCollection 2022.
2
Functional Anatomy of Recognition of Chinese Multi-Character Words: Convergent Evidence from Effects of Transposable Nonwords, Lexicality, and Word Frequency.中文多字词语识别的功能解剖学:来自转位非词效应、词汇性和词频的汇聚证据。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0149583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149583. eCollection 2016.
3
What makes written words so special to the brain?

本文引用的文献

1
Left fusiform BOLD responses are inversely related to word-likeness in a one-back task.左梭状回的 BOLD 反应与一项一背任务中的词似度呈负相关。
Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 1;55(3):1346-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.062. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
2
Modulation of brain regions involved in word recognition by homophonous stimuli: an fMRI study.同音字刺激对参与单词识别的脑区的调制:一项 fMRI 研究。
Brain Res. 2011 Jan 7;1367:250-64. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.089. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
3
What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing? Insights from a meta-analysis.
是什么让书面文字对大脑如此特别?
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Aug 22;8:634. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00634. eCollection 2014.
右半球在语音、词汇语义和句子处理方面有何贡献?一项荟萃分析的启示。
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 1;54(1):577-93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.036. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
4
Executive control in language processing.语言处理中的执行控制
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009 Sep;33(8):1168-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
5
Testing for the dual-route cascade reading model in the brain: an fMRI effective connectivity account of an efficient reading style.检测大脑中的双重通路级联阅读模型:一种 fMRI 有效连接解释高效阅读方式的方法。
PLoS One. 2009 Aug 18;4(8):e6675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006675.
6
The role of inferior frontal gyrus and inferior parietal lobule in semantic processing of Chinese characters.额下回和顶下小叶在汉字语义加工中的作用。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Oct;198(4):465-75. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1942-y. Epub 2009 Jul 18.
7
Hierarchical coding of characters in the ventral and dorsal visual streams of Chinese language processing.中文语言处理腹侧和背侧视觉通路中字符的分层编码。
Neuroimage. 2009 Nov 1;48(2):423-35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.078. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
8
Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies.语义系统在哪里?120 项功能神经影像学研究的批判性回顾和荟萃分析。
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Dec;19(12):2767-96. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp055. Epub 2009 Mar 27.
9
Bayesian model selection for group studies.群体研究的贝叶斯模型选择
Neuroimage. 2009 Jul 15;46(4):1004-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.025. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
10
A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400.一个用于语义的皮层网络:解构N400
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Dec;9(12):920-33. doi: 10.1038/nrn2532.