Yates Mark, Locker Lawrence, Simpson Greg B
University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
Mem Cognit. 2003 Sep;31(6):856-66. doi: 10.3758/bf03196440.
In two experiments, we investigated the relationship between semantics and phonology in the lexical decision task. In the first experiment, lexical decisions to words with large semantic neighborhoods were faster than those to words with sparse semantic neighborhoods. Conversely, this effect of semantic neighborhood was reversed for pseudohomophones (e.g., nale). That is, pseudohomophones based on words with large semantic neighborhoods took longer to reject than did those based on words with sparse semantic neighborhoods. In the second experiment, we found the magnitude of the semantic neighborhood effect for words to be a function of nonword foil type. Taken together, these results indicate that semantic neighborhood size affects processing of both words and pseudohomophones, and that the effect of semantic neighborhood size for words is more pronounced when pseudohomophone foils are employed. These effects are discussed in terms of a model in which the orthographic, phonological, and semantic systems are fully interactive.
在两项实验中,我们在词汇判断任务中研究了语义和语音之间的关系。在第一个实验中,对具有大语义邻域的单词的词汇判断比对具有稀疏语义邻域的单词的判断更快。相反,对于假同音字(例如nale),语义邻域的这种效应则相反。也就是说,基于具有大语义邻域的单词的假同音字比基于具有稀疏语义邻域的单词的假同音字需要更长的时间来拒绝。在第二个实验中,我们发现单词的语义邻域效应的大小是非法语词陪体类型的函数。综合来看,这些结果表明语义邻域大小会影响单词和假同音字的加工,并且当使用假同音字陪体时,语义邻域大小对单词的影响更为明显。我们根据一个正字法、语音和语义系统完全交互的模型来讨论这些效应。