Achim Amélie M, Guitton Matthieu J, Jackson Philip L, Monetta Laura
Centre de recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Sante mentale de Quebec.
Psychol Assess. 2013 Dec;25(4):1407-8. doi: 10.1037/a0034101.
In this response to the comment by Champagne-Lavau and Moreau (2013), we acknowledge the importance of ecological mentalizing assessments that allow direct interactions between the agent and the person to whom mental states are attributed. Furthermore, we clarify that our model, the 8 sources of information framework (8-SIF; Achim, Guitton, Jackson, Boutin, & Monetta, 2013), aims to document the sources of information on which mentalizing processes can act, rather than specifying the numerous affective and cognitive processes involved in mentalizing. We argue that the sources of information that can contribute to mentalizing judgments during real or realistic interactions are included in the 8-SIF. The interaction may have an impact on the amount of information from each source that is available to the agent, but gaining additional information from a given source does not change the type of information or its classification to a specific source in the 8-SIF. The point raised by Champagne-Lavau and Moreau calls for a new comprehensive model of social cognition that focuses on the mentalizing processes, which would nicely complement our model of the sources of information on which these processes can act, the 8-SIF.
在对尚帕涅 - 拉沃和莫罗（2013年）评论的回应中，我们承认生态心理化评估的重要性，这种评估允许施动者与被赋予心理状态的人之间进行直接互动。此外，我们澄清，我们的模型，即8种信息源框架（8 - SIF；阿希姆、吉顿、杰克逊、布廷和莫内塔，2013年），旨在记录心理化过程能够作用于其上的信息源，而非详述心理化过程中所涉及的众多情感和认知过程。我们认为，在真实或现实互动过程中能够促成心理化判断的信息源包含在8 - SIF之中。互动可能会对施动者可获取的来自每个信息源的信息量产生影响，但从给定信息源获取额外信息并不会改变信息的类型，也不会改变其在8 - SIF中归属于特定信息源的分类。尚帕涅 - 拉沃和莫罗提出的观点需要一个专注于心理化过程的全新社会认知综合模型，这将很好地补充我们关于这些过程能够作用于其上的信息源的模型，即8 - SIF。
