• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们基于何种依据进行心理化思考?当前任务的特征以及有助于心理化判断的信息来源。

On what ground do we mentalize? Characteristics of current tasks and sources of information that contribute to mentalizing judgments.

机构信息

Centre de recherche de l’Institut Universitaire en Santé mentale de Québec and Département de Psychiatrie et neurosciences, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2013 Mar;25(1):117-26. doi: 10.1037/a0029137. Epub 2012 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1037/a0029137
PMID:22731676
Abstract

Mentalizing is an aspect of social cognition that is garnering increased interest. Although a wide variety of experimental tasks are available to measure mentalizing abilities in adults, the most widely used tasks typically focus on specific aspects of mentalizing, and mentalizing judgments are performed based on a limited set of information about the agent and the context. Here, we present the Eight Sources of Information Framework (8-SIF), a model that describes the sources of information that can contribute to mentalizing judgments both in real life and in the context of mentalizing tasks. This model is then used to systematically review and analyze the most classical mentalizing tasks, with a particular focus on the sources of information provided as a basis for mentalizing judgments in these tasks. Next, mentalizing tasks with improved ecological validity are also examined, highlighting the greater richness and diversity of the sources of information provided in such tasks relative to the most classical tasks. We believe that the 8-SIF is an important first step to increase awareness of the sources of information that can contribute to mentalizing judgments and to favor investigations of the potential impact of these sources of information on mentalizing performance in different populations.

摘要

心理化是社会认知的一个方面,越来越受到关注。虽然有各种各样的实验任务可以用来衡量成年人的心理化能力,但最广泛使用的任务通常侧重于心理化的特定方面,并且心理化判断是基于对主体和情境的有限信息集做出的。在这里,我们提出了八种信息源框架(8-SIF),该模型描述了可以促进现实生活中和心理化任务中心理化判断的信息源。然后,该模型用于系统地回顾和分析最经典的心理化任务,特别关注这些任务中提供的心理化判断的信息源。接下来,还检查了具有更高生态有效性的心理化任务,突出了这些任务中提供的信息源的丰富性和多样性相对于最经典任务的增加。我们相信,8-SIF 是提高对有助于心理化判断的信息源的认识的重要第一步,并有利于研究这些信息源对不同人群的心理化表现的潜在影响。

相似文献

1
On what ground do we mentalize? Characteristics of current tasks and sources of information that contribute to mentalizing judgments.我们基于何种依据进行心理化思考?当前任务的特征以及有助于心理化判断的信息来源。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Mar;25(1):117-26. doi: 10.1037/a0029137. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
2
Real-life interactions and the eight sources of information framework (8-SIF): a reply to Champagne-Lavau and Moreau (2013).现实生活中的互动与信息来源八框架(8-SIF):对尚帕涅-拉沃和莫罗(2013年)的回应
Psychol Assess. 2013 Dec;25(4):1407-8. doi: 10.1037/a0034101.
3
Characteristics of current tasks that contribute to mentalizing judgments: does the engagement of the participants in the social interaction matter? Comment on Achim et al. (2013).有助于心理化判断的当前任务特征:参与者在社会互动中的参与程度重要吗?对阿希姆等人(2013年)的评论
Psychol Assess. 2013 Dec;25(4):1404-6. doi: 10.1037/a0033433.
4
Common brain regions with distinct patterns of neural responses during mentalizing about groups and individuals.在对群体和个体进行心理化思考时,大脑中存在着具有不同神经反应模式的常见区域。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Sep;25(9):1406-17. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00403. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
5
Metacognition of agency and theory of mind in adults with high functioning autism.高功能自闭症成年人的行动元认知与心理理论
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Jan;31:126-38. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
6
Mentalizing in first-episode psychosis.首发精神病患者的心理化能力。
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Apr 30;196(2-3):207-13. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.10.011. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
7
A dissociation between social mentalizing and general reasoning.社会心理理论和一般推理之间的分离。
Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 15;54(2):1589-99. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.043. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
8
Measuring Mentalizing Ability: A Within-Subject Comparison between an Explicit and Implicit Version of a Ball Detection Task.测量心理理论能力:球检测任务的显性与隐性版本之间的受试者内比较。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 10;11(10):e0164373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164373. eCollection 2016.
9
Is the right frontal cortex really crucial in the mentalizing network? A longitudinal study in patients with a slow-growing lesion.右额前皮质真的是心理化网络中的关键区域吗?一项针对生长缓慢的病变患者的纵向研究。
Cortex. 2013 Nov-Dec;49(10):2711-27. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
10
Age-related differences in the performance of theory of mind in older adults: a dissociation of cognitive and affective components.老年人心理理论表现的年龄差异:认知和情感成分的分离。
Psychol Aging. 2013 Mar;28(1):284-91. doi: 10.1037/a0030876. Epub 2012 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Social knowledge test (SKT) and the Combined stories test (COST) in people with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder.精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的社会知识测试(SKT)和综合故事测试(COST)的心理测量特性。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2025 Jun 21;42:100373. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100373. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
International perspective on social cognition in schizophrenia: current stage and the next steps.精神分裂症社会认知的国际视角:当前阶段与下一步措施
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 15;68(1):e9. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.1776.
3
Discrepancy of social cognition between bipolar disorders and major depressive disorders.
双相情感障碍与重度抑郁症之间社会认知的差异。
Brain Behav. 2024 Jan;14(1):e3365. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3365.
4
Cue Sources and Cue Utilization Patterns of Social Mentalizing during Two-Person Interactions.两人互动过程中社会心理化的线索来源及线索利用模式
J Intell. 2023 Aug 28;11(9):173. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11090173.
5
Systematic Review of Gaming and Neuropsychological Assessment of Social Cognition.游戏与社会认知神经心理学评估的系统综述
Neuropsychol Rev. 2024 Sep;34(3):738-767. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09599-y. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
6
The audience who knew too much: investigating the role of spontaneous theory of mind on the processing of dramatic irony scenes in film.了解过多的观众:探究自发心理理论在电影中戏剧性反讽场景处理中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 4;14:1183660. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183660. eCollection 2023.
7
Examining whether adults with autism spectrum disorder encounter multiple problems in theory of mind: a study based on meta-analysis.探究患有自闭症谱系障碍的成年人在心理理论方面是否会遇到多重问题:一项基于荟萃分析的研究。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1740-1758. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02280-8. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
8
Mindful self-focus-an interaction affecting Theory of Mind?正念自我聚焦——影响心理理论的交互作用?
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 2;18(2):e0279544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279544. eCollection 2023.
9
Italian adaptation of the Edinburgh Social Cognition Test (ESCoT): A new tool for the assessment of theory of mind and social norm understanding.《爱丁堡社会认知测试(ESCoT)的意大利语改编版:一种用于评估心理理论和社会规范理解的新工具》
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 28;13:971187. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971187. eCollection 2022.
10
Disentangling the Relationships Between the Clinical Symptoms of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders and Theory of Mind: A Meta-analysis.精神分裂症谱系障碍的临床症状与心理理论关系的剖析:一项荟萃分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2023 Mar 15;49(2):255-274. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac150.