Rabarison Kristina M, Timsina Lava, Mays Glen P
Kristina M. Rabarison, Lava Timsina, and Glen P. Mays are with the College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington.
Am J Public Health. 2015 Dec;105(12):2526-33. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302795. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
We analyzed the likelihood of chronic disease prevention activities delivery, as a proxy measure of public health decision-making and actions, given that local health agencies (LHAs) implemented a community health assessment and improvement plan in their communities.
Using a propensity score matching approach, we linked data from the 2010 National Association of County and City Health Officials profile of LHAs and the 2010 County Health Rankings to create a statistically matched sample of implementation and comparison LHAs. Implementation LHAs were those that implemented a community health assessment and improvement plan. We estimated the odds of chronic disease prevention activities delivery and the average treatment effect on the treated.
Implementation group LHAs were 2 times as likely (95% confidence interval = 1.60, 2.64) to deliver population-based chronic disease prevention programs than comparison group LHAs. Furthermore, chronic disease prevention activities were more likely to be delivered among implementation group LHAs (6.50-19.02 percentage points higher) than in comparison group LHAs.
Our results signal that routine implementation of a community health assessment and improvement plan in LHAs leads to improved public health decision-making and actions.
鉴于地方卫生机构(LHA)在其社区实施了社区健康评估与改善计划,我们分析了开展慢性病预防活动的可能性,以此作为公共卫生决策和行动的一项替代指标。
我们采用倾向得分匹配法,将2010年全国县市卫生官员协会的地方卫生机构资料数据与2010年县卫生排名数据相链接,以创建一个实施机构和对照地方卫生机构的统计学匹配样本。实施机构是那些实施了社区健康评估与改善计划的机构。我们估计了开展慢性病预防活动的几率以及对实施机构的平均治疗效果。
与对照机构相比,实施组地方卫生机构开展基于人群的慢性病预防项目的可能性高出2倍(95%置信区间 = 1.60, 2.64)。此外,实施组地方卫生机构开展慢性病预防活动的可能性比对照组地方卫生机构更高(高出6.50 - 19.02个百分点)。
我们的结果表明,地方卫生机构常规实施社区健康评估与改善计划可改善公共卫生决策和行动。