• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床文档质量改进:临床治理是否有效?

Quality improvement in clinical documentation: does clinical governance work?

机构信息

Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2013 Dec 2;6:441-50. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S53252. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S53252
PMID:24324339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3855011/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The quality of nursing documentation is still a challenge in the nursing profession and, thus, in the health care industry. One major quality improvement program is clinical governance, whose mission is to continuously improve the quality of patient care and overcome service quality problems. The aim of this study was to identify whether clinical governance improves the quality of nursing documentation.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental method was used to show nursing documentation quality improvement after a 2-year clinical governance implementation. Two hundred twenty random nursing documents were assessed structurally and by content using a valid and reliable researcher made checklist.

RESULTS

There were no differences between a nurse's demographic data before and after 2 years (P>0.05) and the nursing documentation score did not improve after a 2-year clinical governance program.

CONCLUSION

Although some efforts were made to improve nursing documentation through clinical governance, these were not sufficient and more attempts are needed.

摘要

简介

护理文件记录的质量在护理行业乃至整个医疗保健行业仍然是一个挑战。临床治理是提高护理文件记录质量的主要质量改进计划之一,其使命是不断提高患者护理质量并解决服务质量问题。本研究旨在确定临床治理是否能提高护理文件记录的质量。

方法

采用准实验方法,展示临床治理实施 2 年后护理文件记录质量的提高。使用经过验证和可靠的研究者自制清单,对 220 份随机护理文件进行结构和内容评估。

结果

在临床治理实施 2 年后,护士的人口统计学数据前后没有差异(P>0.05),且护理文件记录评分也没有提高。

结论

尽管通过临床治理做出了一些改进护理文件记录的努力,但这些努力还不够,需要更多的尝试。

相似文献

1
Quality improvement in clinical documentation: does clinical governance work?临床文档质量改进:临床治理是否有效?
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2013 Dec 2;6:441-50. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S53252. eCollection 2013.
2
Effectiveness of the Primary Nursing Model on nursing documentation accuracy: A quasi-experimental study.基础护理模式对护理文件记录准确性的影响:一项准实验研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Apr;32(7-8):1251-1261. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16282. Epub 2022 Mar 6.
3
The quality of paper-based versus electronic nursing care plan in Australian aged care homes: A documentation audit study.澳大利亚老年护理院中纸质版与电子版护理计划的质量:一项文档审核研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Aug;84(8):561-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 May 8.
4
[Effects of a computer-assisted system for nursing care documentation on quality and quantity of nursing care documentation].计算机辅助护理记录系统对护理记录质量和数量的影响
Pflege. 2003 Jun;16(3):144-52. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302.16.3.144.
5
Putting policy into practice: pre- and posttests of implementing standardized languages for nursing documentation.将政策付诸实践:实施护理文件标准化语言的前后测试
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Oct;16(10):1826-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01836.x.
6
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
7
Improving the quality of nursing documentation at a residential care home: a clinical audit.提高养老院护理文件记录质量:一项临床审计。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jun 21;20(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00629-9.
8
Does the introduction of an electronic nursing documentation system in a nursing home reduce time on documentation for the nursing staff?养老院引入电子护理记录系统是否会减少护理人员在记录护理方面的时间?
Int J Med Inform. 2011 Nov;80(11):782-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
9
A study of best practices for clinical documentation system implementation.临床文档系统实施的最佳实践研究。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;146:239-43.
10
Improving pain assessment in the NICU: a quality improvement project.改善新生儿重症监护病房的疼痛评估:一项质量改进项目。
Adv Neonatal Care. 2014 Jun;14(3):144-53. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000034.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Clinical Documentation with Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.利用人工智能改善临床文档记录:一项系统综述。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2024 Jun 1;21(2):1d. eCollection 2024 Summer-Fall.
2
An evaluation of staff experiences of the Royal Literary Fund writer-in-residence service to support improvements in written communication in healthcare.对皇家文学基金驻校作家服务项目中工作人员的体验进行评估,以支持改善医疗保健领域的书面沟通。
Qual Res Med Healthc. 2023 Dec 29;7(3):11601. doi: 10.4081/qrmh.2023.11601. eCollection 2023 Dec 4.
3
Prediction of Breast Cancer Survival by Machine Learning Methods: An Application of Multiple Imputation.通过机器学习方法预测乳腺癌生存率:多重填补法的应用
Iran J Public Health. 2021 Mar;50(3):598-605. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i3.5606.
4
Nurses' perspectives of the nursing documentation audit process.护士对护理文件审核过程的看法。
Health SA. 2019 Oct 17;24:1121. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v24i0.1121. eCollection 2019.
5
Rocky Road Ahead Of Nursing Presence in the Oncology Care Unit: A Qualitative Study.肿瘤护理单元护理工作的前路崎岖:一项定性研究
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Nov 20;6(11):2221-2227. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.426. eCollection 2018 Nov 25.
6
Improving Nursing Care Documentation in Emergency Department: A Participatory Action Research Study in Iran.改善急诊科护理记录:伊朗的一项参与式行动研究
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Aug 19;6(8):1527-1532. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.303. eCollection 2018 Aug 20.
7
Modified Use of Team-Based Learning to Teach Nursing Documentation.基于团队学习的改良方法用于教授护理文件记录
Electron Physician. 2016 Jan 15;8(1):1764-9. doi: 10.19082/1764. eCollection 2016 Jan.
8
Assessment of Clinical Risk Management System in Hospitals: An Approach for Quality Improvement.医院临床风险管理系统评估:一种质量改进方法
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Mar 18;7(5):294-303. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n5p294.

本文引用的文献

1
Nursing documentation: frameworks and barriers.护理文件记录:框架与障碍
Contemp Nurse. 2012 Jun;41(2):160-8. doi: 10.5172/conu.2012.41.2.160.
2
Quality of nursing documentation and approaches to its evaluation: a mixed-method systematic review.护理文件记录的质量及其评估方法:一项混合方法系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2011 Sep;67(9):1858-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05634.x. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
3
Advancing nursing documentation--an intervention study using patients with leg ulcer as an example.推进护理记录——以腿部溃疡患者为例的一项干预性研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2009 Sep;78(9):605-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 May 17.
4
Improving reassessment and documentation of pain management.改善疼痛管理的重新评估与记录。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Sep;34(9):509-17. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(08)34065-3.
5
External Quality Assessment: an effective tool for Clinical Governance in laboratory medicine.外部质量评估:检验医学临床治理的有效工具。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(6):740-9. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2006.133.
6
Nursing documentation audit--the effect of a VIPS implementation programme in Denmark.护理文件审核——丹麦VIPS实施计划的效果
J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15(5):525-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01475.x.
7
Testing of an audit instrument for the nursing discharge note in the patient record.对患者病历中护理出院记录审核工具的测试。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2004 Sep;18(3):318-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00288.x.
8
Nursing documentation of leg ulcers: adherence to clinical guidelines in a Swedish primary health care district.腿部溃疡的护理记录:瑞典一个初级卫生保健区对临床指南的遵循情况
Scand J Caring Sci. 2003 Sep;17(3):278-84. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-6712.2003.00231.x.
9
The accuracy of patient records in Swedish nursing homes: congruence of record content and nurses' and patients' descriptions.瑞典养老院患者记录的准确性:记录内容与护士及患者描述的一致性。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2001;15(4):303-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-6712.2001.00044.x.
10
Long-term increase in quality of nursing documentation: effects of a comprehensive intervention.护理文件记录质量的长期提升:一项综合干预措施的效果
Scand J Caring Sci. 2002 Mar;16(1):34-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00049.x.