Kim Steven J, Ribeiro Alexandre L V L, Atlas Alan M, Saleh Najeed, Royal Jamie, Radvar Mehrdad, Korostoff Jonathan
Department of Oral Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Dentistry, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Feb;26(2):183-90. doi: 10.1111/clr.12310. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
To assess the ability of baseline resonance frequency analysis (RFA) measurements to predict early implant failure in the posterior maxilla and to evaluate potential correlations between this measurement with Hounsfield units, bone quality variables, and implant dimension.
This prospective randomized study involved 46 SLActive Straumann implants placed in the posterior maxillae of 21 subjects. Each patient received at least one control (delayed loading) and one experimental (immediate nonfunctional loading) implant. Each site was evaluated with presurgical computer-assisted tomography (CT) scans, histomorphometric analysis of bone cores, and subjective determination of bone quality. Baseline implant stability quotients (ISQ) were determined by RFA measurements made at the time of fixture placement. Pearson's correlation analysis and Spearman's test were used to identify statistically significant correlations within the resultant data. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine whether baseline ISQ values can accurately predict early implant failure.
The mean baseline ISQ values for the two groups were 66.8 (experimental) and 66.2 (control). The 12-month survival rates were 86.4% (experimental) and 100% (control). There were no statistically significant correlations between baseline ISQ values and early implant failure, bone quality variables, or implant dimension. ROC analysis showed that baseline ISQ values cannot predict early implant failure.
Baseline RFA measurements were not able to predict early failure of immediately loaded implants placed in the posterior maxilla and therefore should not be used to determine whether an implant is a candidate for immediate nonfunctional loading in this region of the mouth.
评估基线共振频率分析(RFA)测量预测上颌后牙早期种植体失败的能力,并评估该测量值与亨氏单位、骨质量变量和种植体尺寸之间的潜在相关性。
这项前瞻性随机研究纳入了21名受试者上颌后牙区植入的46枚SLActive士卓曼种植体。每位患者至少接受一枚对照(延迟加载)种植体和一枚实验性(即刻非功能性加载)种植体。每个部位均通过术前计算机断层扫描(CT)、骨芯组织形态计量分析以及骨质量主观判定进行评估。在种植体植入时通过RFA测量确定基线种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)。采用Pearson相关分析和Spearman检验来确定所得数据中的统计学显著相关性。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来确定基线ISQ值是否能够准确预测早期种植体失败。
两组的平均基线ISQ值分别为66.8(实验组)和66.2(对照组)。12个月的生存率分别为86.4%(实验组)和100%(对照组)。基线ISQ值与早期种植体失败、骨质量变量或种植体尺寸之间无统计学显著相关性。ROC分析表明,基线ISQ值无法预测早期种植体失败。
基线RFA测量无法预测上颌后牙即刻加载种植体的早期失败,因此不应将其用于确定该口腔区域的种植体是否适合即刻非功能性加载。