Suppr超能文献

结肠胶囊内镜快速查看视频预览软件:与正常模式阅读相比在呈现大肠息肉方面的可靠性。

QuickView video preview software of colon capsule endoscopy: reliability in presenting colorectal polyps as compared to normal mode reading.

作者信息

Farnbacher Michael J, Krause Horst H, Hagel Alexander F, Raithel Martin, Neurath Markus F, Schneider Thomas

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine 2, Clinical Centre Fuerth, Teaching Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg , 90766 Fuerth , Germany.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar;49(3):339-46. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2013.865784. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) proved to be highly sensitive in detection of colorectal polyps (CP). Major limitation is the time-consuming video reading. The aim of this prospective, double-center study was to assess the theoretical time-saving potential and its possible impact on the reliability of "QuickView" (QV), in the presentation of CP as compared to normal mode (NM). METHODS. During NM reading of 65 CCE videos (mean patient´s age 56 years), all frames showing CPs were collected and compared to the number of frames presented by QV at increasing QV settings (10, 20, ... 80%). Reliability of QV in presenting polyps <6 mm and ≥6 mm (significant polyp), and identifying patients for subsequent therapeutic colonoscopy, capsule egestion rate, cleansing level, and estimated time-saving potential were assessed. RESULTS. At a 30% QV setting, the QV video presented 89% of the significant polyps and 86% of any polyps with ≥1 frame (per-polyp analysis) identified in NM before. At a 10% QV setting, 98% of the 52 patients with significant polyps could be identified (per-patient analysis) by QV video analysis. Capsule excretion rate was 74% and colon cleanliness was adequate in 85%. QV´s presentation rate correlates to the QV setting, the polyp size, and the number of frames per finding. CONCLUSIONS. Depending on its setting, the reliability of QV in presenting CP as compared to NM reading is notable. However, if no significant polyp is presented by QV, NM reading must be performed afterwards. The reduction of frames to be analyzed in QV might speed up identification of candidates for therapeutic colonoscopy.

摘要

目的。结肠胶囊内镜检查(CCE)在检测大肠息肉(CP)方面具有很高的敏感性。主要局限性在于视频解读耗时。这项前瞻性、双中心研究的目的是评估与正常模式(NM)相比,“快速查看”(QV)在呈现CP时理论上节省时间的潜力及其对可靠性的可能影响。方法。在对65个CCE视频(患者平均年龄56岁)进行NM解读期间,收集所有显示CP的帧,并与在不同QV设置(10%、20%、……80%)下QV呈现的帧数进行比较。评估QV在呈现<6 mm和≥6 mm的息肉(显著息肉)、识别后续治疗性结肠镜检查的患者、胶囊排出率、清洁程度以及估计节省时间潜力方面的可靠性。结果。在30%的QV设置下,QV视频呈现了之前在NM中识别出的89%的显著息肉和86%的任何有≥1帧的息肉(逐个息肉分析)。在10%的QV设置下,通过QV视频分析可以识别出98%的52例有显著息肉的患者(逐个患者分析)。胶囊排出率为74%,85%的患者结肠清洁度良好。QV的呈现率与QV设置、息肉大小以及每个发现的帧数相关。结论。根据其设置,与NM解读相比,QV在呈现CP方面的可靠性值得注意。然而,如果QV未呈现显著息肉,则之后必须进行NM解读。减少QV中要分析的帧数可能会加快治疗性结肠镜检查候选者的识别。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验