• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌患者血清腺苷脱氨酶、γ-谷氨酰转移酶和碱性磷酸酶活性——一项关于诊断和预后意义的病例对照研究

Activities of serum Ada, GGT and alp in carcinoma breast-a case control study for diagnostic and prognostic significance.

作者信息

Choudhari Archana, Desai Prakash, Indumati V, Kadi Sumangala

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, Mahadevappa Rampure Medical College, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Indian J Med Sci. 2013 May-Jun;67(5-6):123-9.

PMID:24326764
Abstract

AIM

To assess the clinical utility of Serum adenosine deaminase, gamma glutamyl transferase and alkaline phosphatase in carcinoma breast patients for diagnostic and prognostic purpose.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty clinically and histopathologically confirmed female patients of the age group of 30-65 years served as cases and 30 normal healthy females in the same age group served as controls. The parameters were estimated by standard biochemical methods.

RESULTS

The activities of serum ADA, GGT and ALP were significantly increased in carcinoma breast patients when compared to controls. When all the 4 stages of carcinoma breast were compared with controls ADA and GGT were increased significantly. Whereas ALP showed a significant increase only in stage II, III and IV. Interstage comparison yielded a steady and progressive increase in the activities of these enzymes from stage I-IV.

CONCLUSION

The study concludes that enzyme markers like serum ADA and GGT could be sensitive, specific and cost effective biomarkers for diagnosing carcinoma breast and for monitoring its progression. Serum ALP level can be used as important biomarker for detecting metastasis and for differentiation of carcinoma breast with and without metastasis.

摘要

目的

评估血清腺苷脱氨酶、γ-谷氨酰转移酶和碱性磷酸酶在乳腺癌患者中用于诊断和预后目的的临床效用。

材料与方法

选取30例年龄在30 - 65岁之间、经临床和组织病理学确诊的女性乳腺癌患者作为病例组,另选30例同年龄组的正常健康女性作为对照组。采用标准生化方法测定各项参数。

结果

与对照组相比,乳腺癌患者血清ADA、GGT和ALP的活性显著升高。将乳腺癌的所有4个阶段与对照组进行比较时,ADA和GGT显著升高。而ALP仅在II期、III期和IV期显著升高。各阶段之间的比较显示,从I期到IV期,这些酶的活性呈稳定且逐渐升高的趋势。

结论

该研究得出结论,血清ADA和GGT等酶标志物可能是用于诊断乳腺癌及其进展监测的敏感、特异且具有成本效益的生物标志物。血清ALP水平可作为检测转移以及鉴别有无转移的乳腺癌的重要生物标志物。

相似文献

1
Activities of serum Ada, GGT and alp in carcinoma breast-a case control study for diagnostic and prognostic significance.乳腺癌患者血清腺苷脱氨酶、γ-谷氨酰转移酶和碱性磷酸酶活性——一项关于诊断和预后意义的病例对照研究
Indian J Med Sci. 2013 May-Jun;67(5-6):123-9.
2
Serum adenosine deaminase, 5'-nucleotidase & alkaline phosphatase in breast cancer patients.乳腺癌患者的血清腺苷脱氨酶、5'-核苷酸酶及碱性磷酸酶
Indian J Med Res. 1995 Jun;101:247-9.
3
Prognostic value of alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and lactate dehydrogenase in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with liver resection.碱性磷酸酶、γ-谷氨酰转肽酶和乳酸脱氢酶对肝癌患者行肝切除术后的预后价值。
Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.033. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
4
Model based on γ-glutamyltransferase and alkaline phosphatase for hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis.基于γ-谷氨酰转移酶和碱性磷酸酶的肝细胞癌预后模型。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug 21;20(31):10944-52. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i31.10944.
5
A comparison of gamma-glutamyl transferase and alkaline phosphatase as prognostic markers in patients with coronary heart disease.γ-谷氨酰转移酶和碱性磷酸酶作为冠心病患者预后标志物的比较
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Jan;28(1):64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
6
Model Based on Alkaline Phosphatase and Gamma-Glutamyltransferase for Gallbladder Cancer Prognosis.基于碱性磷酸酶和γ-谷氨酰转移酶的胆囊癌预后模型
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(15):6255-9. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.15.6255.
7
High levels of both serum gamma-glutamyl transferase and alkaline phosphatase are independent preictors of mortality in patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease.血清γ-谷氨酰转移酶和碱性磷酸酶水平升高都是4-5期慢性肾脏病患者死亡的独立预测因素。
Nefrologia. 2017 May-Jun;37(3):267-275. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2016.11.010.
8
A profile of serum CA 15-3, carcinoembryonic antigen, alkaline phosphatase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase levels in patients with breast cancer.
J Surg Oncol. 1993 Jun;53(2):84-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930530206.
9
Serum biochemical markers in carcinoma breast.乳腺癌中的血清生化标志物。
Indian J Med Sci. 2003 Aug;57(8):350-4.
10
Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase level is a novel adverse prognostic indicator in human metastatic colorectal cancer.γ-谷氨酰转肽酶水平是人类转移性结直肠癌的一种新的不良预后指标。
Colorectal Dis. 2013 Aug;15(8):e443-52. doi: 10.1111/codi.12258.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction model for ocular metastasis of breast cancer: machine learning model development and interpretation study.乳腺癌眼部转移预测模型:机器学习模型的开发和解释研究。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Nov 29;24(1):1472. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12928-w.
2
Molecular Aspects of Thyroid Calcification.甲状腺钙化的分子方面。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 19;21(20):7718. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207718.
3
Imbalances in cellular immunological parameters in blood predetermine tumor onset in a natural mouse model of breast cancer.细胞免疫参数失衡可预先确定乳腺癌自然发生小鼠模型中的肿瘤发生。
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2019 May;68(5):721-729. doi: 10.1007/s00262-019-02312-0. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
4
Three gold indicators for breast cancer prognosis: a case-control study with ROC analysis for novel ratios related to CBC with (ALP and LDH).乳腺癌预后的三个黄金指标:一项病例对照研究,采用ROC分析评估与伴(碱性磷酸酶和乳酸脱氢酶)全血细胞计数相关的新比率。
Mol Biol Rep. 2019 Apr;46(2):2013-2027. doi: 10.1007/s11033-019-04650-9. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
5
Prognostic value of routine laboratory variables in prediction of breast cancer recurrence.常规实验室变量对预测乳腺癌复发的预后价值。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 15;7(1):8135. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08240-2.
6
Pre-treatment serum alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase as prognostic factors in triple negative breast cancer.治疗前血清碱性磷酸酶和乳酸脱氢酶作为三阴性乳腺癌的预后因素
J Cancer. 2016 Nov 25;7(15):2309-2316. doi: 10.7150/jca.16622. eCollection 2016.
7
A Molecular View of Pathological Microcalcification in Breast Cancer.乳腺癌病理性微钙化的分子视角
J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2016 Jun;21(1-2):25-40. doi: 10.1007/s10911-015-9349-9. Epub 2016 Jan 15.