• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对具有多个变量的结构方程模型的似然比统计量的经验校正

Empirical Correction to the Likelihood Ratio Statistic for Structural Equation Modeling with Many Variables.

作者信息

Yuan Ke-Hai, Tian Yubin, Yanagihara Hirokazu

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA,

出版信息

Psychometrika. 2015 Jun;80(2):379-405. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9386-5. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1007/s11336-013-9386-5
PMID:24327067
Abstract

Survey data typically contain many variables. Structural equation modeling (SEM) is commonly used in analyzing such data. The most widely used statistic for evaluating the adequacy of a SEM model is T ML, a slight modification to the likelihood ratio statistic. Under normality assumption, T ML approximately follows a chi-square distribution when the number of observations (N) is large and the number of items or variables (p) is small. However, in practice, p can be rather large while N is always limited due to not having enough participants. Even with a relatively large N, empirical results show that T ML rejects the correct model too often when p is not too small. Various corrections to T ML have been proposed, but they are mostly heuristic. Following the principle of the Bartlett correction, this paper proposes an empirical approach to correct T ML so that the mean of the resulting statistic approximately equals the degrees of freedom of the nominal chi-square distribution. Results show that empirically corrected statistics follow the nominal chi-square distribution much more closely than previously proposed corrections to T ML, and they control type I errors reasonably well whenever N ≥ max(50,2p). The formulations of the empirically corrected statistics are further used to predict type I errors of T ML as reported in the literature, and they perform well.

摘要

调查数据通常包含许多变量。结构方程模型(SEM)常用于分析此类数据。用于评估SEM模型适配性的最广泛使用的统计量是T ML,它是似然比统计量的一种轻微修改。在正态性假设下,当观测值数量(N)较大且项目或变量数量(p)较小时,T ML近似服从卡方分布。然而,在实际中,由于没有足够的参与者,p可能会相当大而N总是有限的。即使N相对较大,实证结果表明当p不太小时,T ML也经常拒绝正确的模型。已经提出了对T ML的各种修正,但大多是启发式的。遵循巴特利特修正的原则,本文提出一种实证方法来修正T ML,以使所得统计量的均值近似等于名义卡方分布的自由度。结果表明,经实证修正的统计量比先前提出的对T ML的修正更紧密地遵循名义卡方分布,并且只要N≥max(50,2p),它们就能合理地控制I型错误。经实证修正的统计量的公式进一步用于预测文献中报道的T ML的I型错误,并且表现良好。

相似文献

1
Empirical Correction to the Likelihood Ratio Statistic for Structural Equation Modeling with Many Variables.对具有多个变量的结构方程模型的似然比统计量的经验校正
Psychometrika. 2015 Jun;80(2):379-405. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9386-5. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
2
Empirically Corrected Rescaled Statistics for SEM with Small N and Large p.小样本大 p 结构方程模型的经验校正重标统计量
Multivariate Behav Res. 2017 Nov-Dec;52(6):673-698. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2017.1354759. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
3
The effect of latent and error non-normality on corrections to the test statistic in structural equation modeling.潜在和误差非正态性对结构方程建模中检验统计量校正的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Oct;54(5):2351-2363. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01729-9. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
4
What Causes the Mean Bias of the Likelihood Ratio Statistic with Many Variables?多个变量时似然比统计量的平均偏差是由什么引起的?
Multivariate Behav Res. 2019 Nov-Dec;54(6):840-855. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1596060. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
5
Correcting Too Much or Too Little? The Performance of Three Chi-Square Corrections.校正过多还是过少?三种卡方校正方法的性能表现。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(5):533-43. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1036964.
6
The Noncentral Chi-square Distribution in Misspecified Structural Equation Models: Finite Sample Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation.错误设定的结构方程模型中的非中心卡方分布:蒙特卡罗模拟的有限样本结果
Multivariate Behav Res. 2002 Jan 1;37(1):1-36. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3701_01.
7
Two simple approximations to the distributions of quadratic forms.两种二次型分布的简单逼近。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2010 May;63(Pt 2):273-91. doi: 10.1348/000711009X449771. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
8
Effects of skewness and kurtosis on normal-theory based maximum likelihood test statistic in multilevel structural equation modeling.偏态和峰态对多层结构方程模型中基于正态理论的最大似然检验统计量的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Dec;43(4):1066-74. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0115-7.
9
Generalizing Terwilliger's likelihood approach: a new score statistic to test for genetic association.推广特威利格的似然法:一种用于检验基因关联的新评分统计量。
BMC Genet. 2007 Sep 24;8:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-8-63.
10
A one degree of freedom nominal association model for testing independence in two-way contingency tables.一种用于检验双向列联表中独立性的单自由度名义关联模型。
Stat Med. 1991 Oct;10(10):1555-63. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780101007.

引用本文的文献

1
Making Multimethod Latent State-Trait Models for Random and Fixed Situations Accessible: A Tutorial.使随机和固定情境下的多方法潜在状态-特质模型易于理解:教程
J Pers. 2025 Oct;93(5):1018-1041. doi: 10.1111/jopy.13031. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
Structural equation model of intersectional microaggressions, discrimination, resilience, and mental health among black women with hiv.结构性方程模型:艾滋病毒感染的黑人女性中的交叉微侵犯、歧视、适应力和心理健康
Health Psychol. 2023 May;42(5):299-313. doi: 10.1037/hea0001275.
3
Using the Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual (SRMR) to Assess Exact Fit in Structural Equation Models.

本文引用的文献

1
Fit Indices Versus Test Statistics.适应指数与检验统计量。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2005 Jan 1;40(1):115-48. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4001_5.
2
Structural Equation Modeling with Small Samples: Test Statistics.小样本结构方程模型:检验统计量
Multivariate Behav Res. 1999 Apr 1;34(2):181-97. doi: 10.1207/S15327906Mb340203.
3
A general distribution theory for a class of likelihood criteria.一类似然准则的广义分布理论。
使用标准化均方根残差(SRMR)评估结构方程模型中的精确拟合度。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Feb;81(1):110-130. doi: 10.1177/0013164420926231. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
4
Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices.理解模型大小对结构方程模型拟合指数的影响。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Apr;79(2):310-334. doi: 10.1177/0013164418783530. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
5
Correcting Model Fit Criteria for Small Sample Latent Growth Models With Incomplete Data.针对具有缺失数据的小样本潜在增长模型校正模型拟合标准
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Dec;77(6):990-1018. doi: 10.1177/0013164416661824. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
6
Structural Equation Modeling With Many Variables: A Systematic Review of Issues and Developments.多变量结构方程建模:问题与发展的系统综述
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 25;9:580. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00580. eCollection 2018.
Biometrika. 1949 Dec;36(3-4):317-46.
4
Bootstrap approach to inference and power analysis based on three test statistics for covariance structure models.基于协方差结构模型的三种检验统计量的推断和功效分析的自助法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2003 May;56(Pt 1):93-110. doi: 10.1348/000711003321645368.
5
When fit indices and residuals are incompatible.当拟合指数和残差不兼容时。
Psychol Methods. 2002 Dec;7(4):403-21. doi: 10.1037//1082-989x.7.4.403.
6
Fitting structural equation models using estimating equations: a model segregation approach.使用估计方程拟合结构方程模型:一种模型分离方法。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2002 May;55(Pt 1):41-62. doi: 10.1348/000711002159699.
7
Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research.结构方程模型在心理学研究中的应用。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51:201-26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201.
8
Normal theory based test statistics in structural equation modelling.结构方程建模中基于正态理论的检验统计量
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1998 Nov;51 ( Pt 2):289-309. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1998.tb00682.x.
9
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.结构模型中的比较拟合指数。
Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.
10
Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?协方差结构分析中的检验统计量可信吗?
Psychol Bull. 1992 Sep;112(2):351-62. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.351.