Thiede Birgit, Kramer Axel
Regional Council, Darmstadt, Germany.
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2013 Nov 6;8(2):Doc20. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000220. eCollection 2013.
Safe reprocessing of medical devices through cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization is essential for the prevention of health care associated infections (HAI) and to guarantee patient safety. Several studies detected residual contamination and even severe infections of patients, despite carrying out reprocessing. To develop appropriate solutions, the existing situation in Germany and selected European countries was analyzed. Additionally, in 27 medical practitioners' offices and 14 hospitals, the true practice of reprocessing was analyzed using a questionnaire, a checklist, and inspection on site. A structured analysis of potential alternatives to the internal reprocessing was conducted within the German and European context. The results indicate that the conditions for the execution of the reprocessing process in the analyzed health facilities in southern Hesse (Germany) do not satisfy legal requirements. The detected deficiencies were consistent with other reports from Germany and Europe. The analysis gave insight into several reasons for the detected deficiencies. The three main reasons were the high costs for proper implementation, the subjective value assigned to the reprocessing unit in health care facilities, and deficits in monitoring by the health authority. Throughout the European Union, a similar regulatory framework for the performance of the reprocessing process exists, while the environment, structures of the health systems and administrative supervision vary significantly. The German states as well as selected European countries are currently discussing the challenges of increased quality-assured execution of the reprocessing process. For instance, the same supervisory system for hospitals and medical practitioners should be established at an equal standard. Alternatives such as the use of single-use medical devices, outsourcing the decontamination processes, or the cooperation of health facilities may be considered. This paper also discusses economic and ecological aspects. Finally, different options are recommended to ensure the exclusive use of reliable medical devices for surgical procedures that guarantee an adequate standard of patient safety within economic constraints.
通过清洁、消毒和灭菌对医疗器械进行安全再处理对于预防医疗保健相关感染(HAI)和保障患者安全至关重要。尽管进行了再处理,但多项研究仍检测到残留污染,甚至有患者发生严重感染。为了制定合适的解决方案,对德国和部分欧洲国家的现状进行了分析。此外,在27个医疗从业者办公室和14家医院,通过问卷调查、清单以及现场检查对再处理的实际操作情况进行了分析。在德国和欧洲范围内对内部再处理的潜在替代方案进行了结构化分析。结果表明,德国黑森州南部被分析的医疗机构中执行再处理过程的条件不符合法律要求。检测到的缺陷与德国和欧洲的其他报告一致。该分析揭示了检测到这些缺陷的几个原因。三个主要原因是正确实施的高成本、医疗机构对再处理部门的主观重视程度以及卫生当局监管方面的不足。在整个欧盟,存在类似的再处理过程执行监管框架,而环境、卫生系统结构和行政监督差异显著。德国各州以及部分欧洲国家目前正在讨论提高再处理过程质量保证执行方面的挑战。例如,应为医院和医疗从业者建立同等标准的监督体系。可以考虑使用一次性医疗器械、将去污过程外包或医疗机构合作等替代方案。本文还讨论了经济和生态方面的问题。最后,建议采取不同的选择方案,以确保在经济限制范围内,外科手术专用可靠医疗器械能保证足够的患者安全标准。