• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反复再处理的椎弓根螺钉中存在污染物

Harboring Contaminants in Repeatedly Reprocessed Pedicle Screws.

作者信息

Agarwal Aakash, Schultz Christian, Agarwal Anand K, Wang Jeffrey C, Garfin Steve R, Anand Neel

机构信息

University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA.

Apex Spine, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2019 Apr;9(2):173-178. doi: 10.1177/2192568218784298. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1177/2192568218784298
PMID:30984497
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6448207/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

It consisted of evaluation of the pedicle screws for presence of residual nonmicrobial contaminants and tabulation of the minimum steps and time required for reprocessing implants as per guidelines and its comparison with actual practice.

OBJECTIVE

An evaluation of the nonmicrobial contaminants prevalent on the pedicle screws used for spine surgery and the underlying practice cause behind the source.

METHODS

The first component consisted of a random selection of 6 pedicle screws and its assessment using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The second component consisted of review of implant reprocessing guidelines and its applicability.

RESULTS

Three types of contaminants were identified: corrosion, saccharide of unknown origin, and soap residue mixed with and were mostly present at the interfaces with low permeability. In addition, manufacturer's guideline recommends 19 hours of reprocessing, whereas the real-time observation revealed a turnaround time of 1 hour 17 minutes.

CONCLUSION

Repeatedly reprocessed pedicle screws host corrosion, carbohydrate, fat, and soap, which could be a cause of surgical site infection and inflammatory responses postsurgery. The cause behind it is the impracticality of repeated cleaning and inspection of such devices.

摘要

研究设计

该研究包括评估椎弓根螺钉是否存在残留的非微生物污染物,按照指南将再处理植入物所需的最少步骤和时间制成表格,并将其与实际操作进行比较。

目的

评估脊柱手术中使用的椎弓根螺钉上普遍存在的非微生物污染物以及其来源背后的实际操作原因。

方法

第一部分包括随机选择6枚椎弓根螺钉,并使用光学显微镜、带能谱的扫描电子显微镜和傅里叶变换红外光谱对其进行评估。第二部分包括审查植入物再处理指南及其适用性。

结果

识别出三种类型的污染物:腐蚀物、来源不明的糖类以及混合的肥皂残留物,且大多存在于低渗透性的界面处。此外,制造商的指南建议再处理时间为19小时,而实际观察显示周转时间为1小时17分钟。

结论

反复再处理的椎弓根螺钉存在腐蚀、碳水化合物、脂肪和肥皂,这可能是手术部位感染和术后炎症反应的原因。其背后的原因是对此类器械进行反复清洁和检查不切实际。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7814/6448207/fe4828a68ba5/10.1177_2192568218784298-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7814/6448207/5b70d9f4a089/10.1177_2192568218784298-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7814/6448207/77204802c505/10.1177_2192568218784298-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7814/6448207/3de2096f7440/10.1177_2192568218784298-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7814/6448207/d8a5cfb79297/10.1177_2192568218784298-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7814/6448207/fe4828a68ba5/10.1177_2192568218784298-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7814/6448207/5b70d9f4a089/10.1177_2192568218784298-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7814/6448207/77204802c505/10.1177_2192568218784298-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7814/6448207/3de2096f7440/10.1177_2192568218784298-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7814/6448207/d8a5cfb79297/10.1177_2192568218784298-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7814/6448207/fe4828a68ba5/10.1177_2192568218784298-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Harboring Contaminants in Repeatedly Reprocessed Pedicle Screws.反复再处理的椎弓根螺钉中存在污染物
Global Spine J. 2019 Apr;9(2):173-178. doi: 10.1177/2192568218784298. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
2
Structural damage and chemical contaminants on reprocessed arthroscopic shaver blades.再处理后的关节镜刨削器刀片上的结构损伤和化学污染物。
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Feb;37(2):266-73. doi: 10.1177/0363546508325668. Epub 2008 Dec 31.
3
Updates on Evidence-Based Practices to Reduce Preoperative and Intraoperative Contamination of Implants in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.减少脊柱手术中植入物术前和术中污染的循证实践进展:一项叙述性综述
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019 Jun 21;4(2):111-116. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2019-0038. eCollection 2020.
4
Implant Prophylaxis: The Next Best Practice Toward Asepsis in Spine Surgery.植入物预防:脊柱手术无菌操作的下一个最佳实践
Global Spine J. 2018 Oct;8(7):761-765. doi: 10.1177/2192568218762380. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
5
Reprocessing safety issues associated with complex-design orthopaedic loaned surgical instruments and implants.与复杂设计的骨科租借手术器械和植入物相关的再处理安全问题。
Injury. 2018 Nov;49(11):2005-2012. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
6
A Multicenter Trial Demonstrating Presence or Absence of Bacterial Contamination at the Screw-Bone Interface Owing to Absence or Presence of Pedicle Screw Guard, Respectively, During Spinal Fusion.一项多中心试验,分别在脊柱融合过程中观察有无椎弓根螺钉保护套时螺钉骨界面的细菌污染情况。
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Oct;33(8):E364-E368. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000976.
7
Robotic versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for metastatic spinal disease: a matched-cohort comparison.机器人辅助与透视引导下椎弓根螺钉置入治疗脊柱转移性疾病:配对队列比较
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 May;42(5):E13. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1710.
8
Fretting corrosion behavior of nitinol spinal rods in conjunction with titanium pedicle screws.镍钛诺脊柱棒与钛椎弓根螺钉结合的微动腐蚀行为
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Mar 1;72:601-610. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.120. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
9
Snake-Eye Screwing: A Novel Free-Hand Technique of Pedicle Screw Placement in Cervicothoracic Spine and Preliminary Clinical Results.蛇眼拧螺丝:颈椎胸椎脊柱置钉的新型徒手技术及初步临床结果。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Feb;13(1):35-44. doi: 10.1111/os.12809. Epub 2020 Dec 6.
10
Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination.术中植入物预防措施在减少术中微生物污染方面的疗效
Global Spine J. 2019 Feb;9(1):62-66. doi: 10.1177/2192568218780676. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Individualization of implantable devices in Brazil.巴西可植入设备的个体化
Rev Bras Enferm. 2025 Feb 3;78(2):e780201. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167.2025780201. eCollection 2025.
2
A prospective study to identify preoperative serum parameters for spinal implant infection detected by sonication fluid culture.一项前瞻性研究旨在通过超声液培养来确定可检测脊柱植入物感染的术前血清参数。
Eur Spine J. 2023 May;32(5):1818-1829. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07628-1. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
3
High Prevalence of Biofilms on Retrieved Implants from Aseptic Pseudarthrosis Cases.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of Postoperative Thoracolumbar Spine Infections in a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Using the Centers for Disease Control Surgical Site Infection Criteria.使用疾病控制中心手术部位感染标准的前瞻性随机对照试验中胸腰椎术后感染的分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Apr 21;10:14. doi: 10.14444/3014. eCollection 2016.
2
Single-use instrumentation in posterior lumbar fusion could decrease incidence of surgical site infection: a prospective bi-centric study.后路腰椎融合术中使用一次性器械可降低手术部位感染发生率:一项前瞻性双中心研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 Jan;26(1):21-6. doi: 10.1007/s00590-015-1692-4. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
3
无菌性假关节病例取出的植入物上生物膜的高发生率。
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2020 Sep 23;5(2):104-108. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2020-0147. eCollection 2021.
4
Future directions of postoperative spinal implant infections.术后脊柱植入物感染的未来发展方向。
J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;6(4):814-819. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-585.
5
Implant contamination as a cause of surgical site infection in spinal surgery: are single-use implants a reasonable solution? - a systematic review.植入物污染作为脊柱手术手术部位感染的一个原因:一次性使用植入物是一个合理的解决方案吗?——一项系统评价
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Sep 25;21(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03653-z.
6
Implant Retention or Removal for Management of Surgical Site Infection After Spinal Surgery.脊柱手术后手术部位感染管理中植入物的保留或取出
Global Spine J. 2020 Aug;10(5):640-646. doi: 10.1177/2192568219869330. Epub 2019 Aug 11.
7
Updates on Evidence-Based Practices to Reduce Preoperative and Intraoperative Contamination of Implants in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.减少脊柱手术中植入物术前和术中污染的循证实践进展:一项叙述性综述
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2019 Jun 21;4(2):111-116. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2019-0038. eCollection 2020.
Evaluation of reprocessing medical devices in 14 German regional hospitals and at 27 medical practitioners' offices within the European context - consequences for European harmonization.
在欧洲背景下对德国14家地区医院和27家医生诊所的医疗设备再处理进行评估——对欧洲协调的影响。
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2013 Nov 6;8(2):Doc20. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000220. eCollection 2013.
4
The 'pandora's box' dilemma: reprocessing of implantable screws and plates in orthopedic tray sets.“潘多拉魔盒”困境:骨科托盘套装中可植入螺钉和钢板的再处理
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2012 Spring;Suppl:55-9. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-12.1.55.
5
Cleaning efficacy of medical device washers in North American healthcare facilities.北美医疗机构医疗器械清洗机的清洗效果。
J Hosp Infect. 2010 Feb;74(2):168-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.06.030. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
6
Shifting the sterile processing department paradigm: a mandate for change.转变无菌处理部门模式:变革的要求。
AORN J. 2008 Aug;88(2):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2008.01.021.
7
Perspectives from sterile processing and perioperative services.来自无菌处理和围手术期服务的观点。
Mater Manag Health Care. 2003 Feb;12(2):22-5.
8
The impact of surgical-site infections following orthopedic surgery at a community hospital and a university hospital: adverse quality of life, excess length of stay, and extra cost.社区医院和大学医院骨科手术后手术部位感染的影响:生活质量下降、住院时间延长和额外费用增加。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002 Apr;23(4):183-9. doi: 10.1086/502033.
9
Hospital uses team approach to improve processes, reduce costs.医院采用团队协作的方式来改进流程、降低成本。
AORN J. 1998 Jul;68(1):68-72. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)62715-4.