• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国居民碳足迹的空间分布揭示了郊区化破坏了城市人口密度对温室气体减排的好处。

Spatial distribution of U.S. household carbon footprints reveals suburbanization undermines greenhouse gas benefits of urban population density.

机构信息

Energy and Resources Group, ‡Goldman School of Public Policy, and §Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of California , Berkeley, California 94720, United States.

出版信息

Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Jan 21;48(2):895-902. doi: 10.1021/es4034364. Epub 2014 Jan 2.

DOI:10.1021/es4034364
PMID:24328208
Abstract

Which municipalities and locations within the United States contribute the most to household greenhouse gas emissions, and what is the effect of population density and suburbanization on emissions? Using national household surveys, we developed econometric models of demand for energy, transportation, food, goods, and services that were used to derive average household carbon footprints (HCF) for U.S. zip codes, cities, counties, and metropolitan areas. We find consistently lower HCF in urban core cities (∼ 40 tCO2e) and higher carbon footprints in outlying suburbs (∼ 50 tCO2e), with a range from ∼ 25 to >80 tCO2e in the 50 largest metropolitan areas. Population density exhibits a weak but positive correlation with HCF until a density threshold is met, after which range, mean, and standard deviation of HCF decline. While population density contributes to relatively low HCF in the central cities of large metropolitan areas, the more extensive suburbanization in these regions contributes to an overall net increase in HCF compared to smaller metropolitan areas. Suburbs alone account for ∼ 50% of total U.S. HCF. Differences in the size, composition, and location of household carbon footprints suggest the need for tailoring of greenhouse gas mitigation efforts to different populations.

摘要

美国哪些城市和地区的家庭温室气体排放量最大,人口密度和郊区化对排放量有什么影响?我们利用全国性家庭调查,建立了能源、交通、食品、商品和服务需求的计量经济学模型,用于推导出美国邮政编码、城市、县和大都市区的家庭平均碳足迹(HCF)。我们发现城市核心区的 HCF 始终较低(约 40 吨二氧化碳当量),而远郊的碳足迹较高(约 50 吨二氧化碳当量),在 50 个最大的大都市区范围内,HCF 的范围从 25 到>80 吨二氧化碳当量不等。人口密度与 HCF 呈弱正相关,但在达到密度阈值后,HCF 的范围、平均值和标准差下降。虽然人口密度导致大都市区中心城市的 HCF 相对较低,但这些地区更为广泛的郊区化导致与较小的大都市区相比,HCF 总量净增加。仅郊区就占美国 HCF 的约 50%。家庭碳足迹的大小、组成和位置的差异表明,需要针对不同人群调整温室气体减排工作。

相似文献

1
Spatial distribution of U.S. household carbon footprints reveals suburbanization undermines greenhouse gas benefits of urban population density.美国居民碳足迹的空间分布揭示了郊区化破坏了城市人口密度对温室气体减排的好处。
Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Jan 21;48(2):895-902. doi: 10.1021/es4034364. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
2
Quantifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities for U.S. households and communities.量化美国居民家庭和社区的碳足迹减排机会。
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 May 1;45(9):4088-95. doi: 10.1021/es102221h. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
3
Scale, distribution and variations of global greenhouse gas emissions driven by U.S. households.美国居民生活导致的全球温室气体排放的规模、分布和变化。
Environ Int. 2019 Dec;133(Pt A):105137. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105137. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
4
The metropolitanization and suburbanization of the U.S. elderly population: 1970-1988.美国老年人口的大都市化与郊区化:1970 - 1988年
Gerontologist. 1990 Feb;30(1):80-5. doi: 10.1093/geront/30.1.80.
5
Waste-to-energy incineration plants as greenhouse gas reducers: a case study of seven Japanese metropolises.垃圾焚烧发电厂作为温室气体减排的手段:以日本七个大都市为例。
Waste Manag Res. 2013 Nov;31(11):1110-7. doi: 10.1177/0734242X13502385. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
6
Urban and country level greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprints: A comparative study of a megacity, Delhi and India.城市和乡村层面的温室气体排放及碳足迹:对特大城市德里与印度的一项比较研究。
J Environ Sci Eng. 2011 Apr;53(2):137-42.
7
Research on the changing trend of the carbon footprint of residents' consumption in Beijing.研究北京居民消费碳足迹的变化趋势。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Feb;26(4):4078-4090. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3931-9. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
8
Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. liquefied natural gas exports: implications for end uses.美国液化天然气出口的生命周期温室气体排放:对终端用途的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Mar 3;49(5):3237-45. doi: 10.1021/es505617p. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
9
Greenhouse gas emissions from production chain of a cigarette manufacturing industry in Pakistan.巴基斯坦卷烟制造业生产链的温室气体排放。
Environ Res. 2014 Oct;134:81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2014.06.015. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
10
Greenhouse gas emission footprints and energy use benchmarks for eight U.S. cities.美国八个城市的温室气体排放足迹和能源使用基准。
Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Mar 15;44(6):1902-10. doi: 10.1021/es9024194.

引用本文的文献

1
A value-based topography of climate change beliefs and behaviors.基于价值观的气候变化信念与行为地形图。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Feb 11;4(2):pgae590. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae590. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Curbing household food waste and associated climate change impacts in an ageing society.遏制老龄化社会中的家庭食物浪费和相关的气候变化影响。
Nat Commun. 2024 Oct 21;15(1):8806. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51553-w.
3
Unveiling patterns in human dominated landscapes through mapping the mass of US built structures.通过绘制美国已建成建筑物的体量图揭示人类主导景观中的模式。
Nat Commun. 2023 Dec 4;14(1):8014. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43755-5.
4
Negative responses to urban residential noise as a social rebound effect of increasing population density: Legislative challenges and auditory territoriality.城市居住噪声的负面反应是人口密度增加的社会反弹效应:立法挑战与听觉领地性。
Noise Health. 2021 Jan-Mar;23(108):35-41. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_45_18.
5
A Gini approach to spatial CO2 emissions.基尼系数方法研究 CO2 排放的空间特征。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 18;15(11):e0242479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242479. eCollection 2020.
6
The Vulcan Version 3.0 High-Resolution Fossil Fuel CO Emissions for the United States.美国的“瓦肯3.0版”高分辨率化石燃料一氧化碳排放
J Geophys Res Atmos. 2020 Oct 16;125(19):e2020JD032974. doi: 10.1029/2020JD032974. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
7
The carbon footprint of household energy use in the United States.美国家庭能源使用的碳足迹。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 11;117(32):19122-19130. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1922205117. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
8
Effects of changing population or density on urban carbon dioxide emissions.人口或密度变化对城市二氧化碳排放的影响。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 19;10(1):3204. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11184-y.
9
What Role Should Government Play in the Personal Carbon Trading Market: Motivator or Punisher?政府在个人碳交易市场中应扮演何种角色:激励者还是惩罚者?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 29;16(11):1905. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111905.
10
Going Global to Local: Connecting Top-Down Accounting and Local Impacts, A Methodological Review of Spatially Explicit Input-Output Approaches.走向全球化到本地化:连接自上而下的会计核算和本地化影响,空间显式投入产出方法的综述。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Feb 5;53(3):1048-1062. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b03148. Epub 2019 Jan 25.