Taniguchi K, Urasawa S
Arch Virol. 1987;92(1-2):27-40. doi: 10.1007/BF01310060.
Two neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (4 C 4 and 4 F 2) against type 1 poliovirus, Mahoney strain, recognized distinct antigenic sites of the virus particles; 4 C 4 antibody bound to vertices of native and heated (56 degrees C, 30 minutes) virus of Mahoney strain, while 4 F 2 antibody reacted with specific surface protrusions of native virus of Mahoney and Sabin strains. The difference in the location of neutralization epitopes with which the two antibodies react was confirmed in the neutralization reaction by the use of mutants resistant to 4 C 4 and 4 F 2 antibody. In immune electron microscopy, double immunodiffusion and sucrose density gradient analysis of virus-antibody complexes, the two antibodies showed a marked difference in their virus-precipitating activities. The 4 C 4 antibody recognizing vertices of the virus particle had little virus-precipitating activity. In contrast, the 4 F 2 antibody that bound to specific surface protrusions of native virus aggregated virus particle efficiently. In neutralization assays, however, the 4 C 4 antibody exhibited a slightly stronger neutralizing activity than the 4 F 2 antibody. Thus, it was suggested that the strength in precipitating activities of the two antibodies did not correlate with that in their neutralizing activities.
两种针对1型脊髓灰质炎病毒马奥尼株的中和单克隆抗体(4C4和4F2)识别病毒颗粒的不同抗原位点;4C4抗体与马奥尼株天然及加热(56℃,30分钟)病毒的顶点结合,而4F2抗体与马奥尼株和萨宾株天然病毒的特定表面突起反应。通过使用对4C4和4F2抗体耐药的突变体,在中和反应中证实了两种抗体所反应的中和表位位置的差异。在免疫电镜、病毒-抗体复合物的双向免疫扩散和蔗糖密度梯度分析中,两种抗体在病毒沉淀活性方面表现出明显差异。识别病毒颗粒顶点的4C4抗体几乎没有病毒沉淀活性。相反,与天然病毒特定表面突起结合的4F2抗体能有效聚集病毒颗粒。然而,在中和试验中,4C4抗体的中和活性略强于4F2抗体。因此,提示两种抗体的沉淀活性强度与其中和活性强度不相关。