Glenn M. Landers is with the Georgia Health Policy Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta.
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e74-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301697. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
This is the first, to my knowledge, multistate, county-level analysis of Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project state inpatient data to examine the relationship between smoke-free laws and asthma discharges.
I used treatment and control groups to examine the effects of state and county or city smoke-free laws separately and together (2002-2009). I compared quarterly county-level discharge rates before and after the implementation of 12 state smoke-free laws, accounting for counties with preexisting county or city smoke-free laws and using the data from 5 states without state smoke-free laws as a control group. I used difference-in-differences models, controlling for year and state fixed effects, state cigarette taxes, seasonality, and numerous county-level factors.
I observed statistically significant reductions in asthma discharges after the implementation of county smoke-free laws but no statistically significant effect of state laws besides the effect of county laws or of state laws alone. There was also no statistically significant effect of any smoke-free law on appendicitis discharges.
It may be unwise to pursue state smoke-free laws where they have yet to pass; rather, efforts might be better focused at the local level, where there is evidence of a significant impact.
据我所知,这是首次利用医疗保健成本和利用项目州立住院数据进行的多州、县级分析,旨在研究无烟法律与哮喘出院率之间的关系。
我使用处理组和对照组分别和同时研究州和县级或市级无烟法律的影响(2002-2009 年)。我比较了 12 项州无烟法律实施前后的每季度县级出院率,同时考虑到已经存在县级或市级无烟法律的县,并将 5 个没有州无烟法律的州的数据作为对照组。我使用差异中的差异模型,控制了年度和州固定效应、州香烟税、季节性以及众多县级因素。
我观察到县级无烟法律实施后哮喘出院率有统计学意义上的降低,但州法律除了县级法律或单独的州法律的影响外,没有统计学意义上的影响。任何无烟法律对阑尾炎出院率也没有统计学意义上的影响。
在尚未通过的州推行无烟法律可能不明智;相反,可能更好地将努力集中在地方一级,那里有证据表明存在重大影响。