Suppr超能文献

无烟法律对哮喘出院的影响:一项多州分析。

The impact of smoke-free laws on asthma discharges: a multistate analysis.

机构信息

Glenn M. Landers is with the Georgia Health Policy Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e74-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301697. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This is the first, to my knowledge, multistate, county-level analysis of Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project state inpatient data to examine the relationship between smoke-free laws and asthma discharges.

METHODS

I used treatment and control groups to examine the effects of state and county or city smoke-free laws separately and together (2002-2009). I compared quarterly county-level discharge rates before and after the implementation of 12 state smoke-free laws, accounting for counties with preexisting county or city smoke-free laws and using the data from 5 states without state smoke-free laws as a control group. I used difference-in-differences models, controlling for year and state fixed effects, state cigarette taxes, seasonality, and numerous county-level factors.

RESULTS

I observed statistically significant reductions in asthma discharges after the implementation of county smoke-free laws but no statistically significant effect of state laws besides the effect of county laws or of state laws alone. There was also no statistically significant effect of any smoke-free law on appendicitis discharges.

CONCLUSIONS

It may be unwise to pursue state smoke-free laws where they have yet to pass; rather, efforts might be better focused at the local level, where there is evidence of a significant impact.

摘要

目的

据我所知,这是首次利用医疗保健成本和利用项目州立住院数据进行的多州、县级分析,旨在研究无烟法律与哮喘出院率之间的关系。

方法

我使用处理组和对照组分别和同时研究州和县级或市级无烟法律的影响(2002-2009 年)。我比较了 12 项州无烟法律实施前后的每季度县级出院率,同时考虑到已经存在县级或市级无烟法律的县,并将 5 个没有州无烟法律的州的数据作为对照组。我使用差异中的差异模型,控制了年度和州固定效应、州香烟税、季节性以及众多县级因素。

结果

我观察到县级无烟法律实施后哮喘出院率有统计学意义上的降低,但州法律除了县级法律或单独的州法律的影响外,没有统计学意义上的影响。任何无烟法律对阑尾炎出院率也没有统计学意义上的影响。

结论

在尚未通过的州推行无烟法律可能不明智;相反,可能更好地将努力集中在地方一级,那里有证据表明存在重大影响。

相似文献

1
The impact of smoke-free laws on asthma discharges: a multistate analysis.无烟法律对哮喘出院的影响:一项多州分析。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Feb;104(2):e74-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301697. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
9
Tobacco Control Laws and Pediatric Asthma.控烟法律与儿童哮喘
Pediatrics. 2018 Jan;141(Suppl 1):S130-S136. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1026P.

引用本文的文献

10
Smoke-free legislation and child health.无烟立法与儿童健康。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2016 Nov 17;26:16067. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.67.

本文引用的文献

4
The impact of Medicaid insurance coverage on dental service use.医疗补助保险覆盖范围对牙科服务利用的影响。
J Health Econ. 2011 Sep;30(5):1020-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.08.002. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
6
The impact of the 2002 Delaware smoking ordinance on heart attack and asthma.2002 年特拉华州吸烟条例对心脏病和哮喘的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010 Dec;7(12):4169-78. doi: 10.3390/ijerph7124169. Epub 2010 Dec 2.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验