Kolasa Katarzyna, Zah Vladimir, Kowalczyk Marta
a Kozminski University , Division of Health Economics and Healthcare Management , Warsaw , Poland.
b ZRx Outcomes Research , Health Economics , Mississauga , ON , Canada.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Aug;18(4):379-391. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1467759. Epub 2018 Apr 29.
As budget constraints become more and more visible, there is growing recognition for greater transparency and greater stakeholders' engagement in the pharmaceuticals' pric-ing&reimbursement (P&R) decision making. New frameworks of drugs' value assessments are searched for. Among them, the multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) receives more and more attention. In 2014, ISPOR established Task Force to provide methodological recommendations for MCDA utilization in the health care decision making. Still, there is not so much knowledge about the real life experience with MCDA's adaptation to the P&R processes.
A systematic literature review was performed to understand the rationale for MCDA adaptation, methodology used as well as its impact on P&R outcomes.
In total 102 hits were found through the search of databases, out of which 18 publications were selected. Although limited in scope, the review highlighted how MCDA can im-prove the decision making processes not only regarding pricing & reimbursement but also contribute to the the risk benefit assessment as well as optimization of treatment outcomes. Still none of re-viewed studies did report how MCDA results actually impacted the real life settings.
随着预算限制日益明显,人们越来越认识到在药品定价与报销(P&R)决策中需要更高的透明度以及利益相关者更多的参与。人们正在寻找新的药物价值评估框架。其中,多标准决策分析(MCDA)受到越来越多的关注。2014年,国际药物经济学与结果研究协会(ISPOR)成立了特别工作组,为在医疗保健决策中使用MCDA提供方法学建议。然而,对于MCDA应用于P&R流程的实际经验,人们了解得并不多。
进行了一项系统的文献综述,以了解采用MCDA的基本原理、所使用的方法及其对P&R结果的影响。
通过搜索数据库共找到102条结果,从中筛选出18篇出版物。尽管范围有限,但该综述强调了MCDA不仅可以改善定价与报销方面的决策过程,还能有助于风险效益评估以及优化治疗结果。不过,所审查的研究均未报告MCDA结果如何实际影响现实生活中的情况。